The argument states that a lucrative proposal must be offered to Autotech in order to convince them to set up their automobile manufacturing plant in Hillview. This is to provide relief to the residents, based on the fact that that several of them are unemployed after the recent shut-down of Computech. However, before this recommendation can be properly evaluated, three questions must be answered.
Firstly, is the Hillview landfill an apt choice of location for Autotech's manufacturing plant? In other words, despite the fact that the site is described to be 'perfect' for the purpose, will all of the company's requirements be fullfilled by this location? It is possible that apart from the landscape size and available area, no other factors are conducive for the set-up. Further, there is a possibility that the climactic conditions of Hillview are not appropriate for the manufacturing activities. If either of these scenarios has merit, then the recommendation will not be appropriate.
Secondly, are the Hillview locals in conjunction with this proposal? Admittedly, thousands of residents are left unemployed post a recent event of abandonment by Computech. However, will the rest of the population, of in fact, even the unemployed ones be open to accepting a new manufacturing plant, that could possibly be harmful to the ennvironment. In the case that Autotech's manufacturing plant severly damanges the flora and fauna of the Hillview landfill, the public could oppose to this idea. Moreover, this plant could lead to severe air and water pollutioon by means of fumes or liquid disposal which could have a detrimental effect on Hillview's environment. If any of the above is true, ther recommendation does not hold water.
Lastly, are the Hillview people qualified for the underlying job? The recommendation prematurely assumes that a large chunk of the population will gain employment from this proposition. However, do the residents possess the required skill set to perform the activities under the job? Perhaps, even the people previously engaged with Computech are not appropriate for these new jobs as Autotech operations may be significantly different to those of Computech. The proponents not only make the sweeping assumption that the people previously employed with Computech will have a similar work profile at Autotech and thus be hired, but also assumes that any of the people will be appropriate for the job at all. In the case that the contrary is true, this suggestion is significantly flawed.
In conclusion, the argument relies on certain unwarranted assumptions that render it unconvincing as it stands. If the above mentioned questions can be answered, perhaps in the form of detailed description of the residents' skill set, the job profiles, the expected environmental impacts and son on, in the form of a systematic study, then it will be possible to fully evaluate the viablity of this recommendation of authorizing a campaign to attract a manufacturing plant
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...bed to be perfect for the purpose, will all of the companys requirements be fullfilled by ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...cepting a new manufacturing plant, that could possibly be harmful to the ennvironment. In the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...the form of detailed description of the residents skill set, the job profiles, the expect...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 477.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28092243187 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1572076473 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 204.123752495 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498951781971 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 705.55239521 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5533345408 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6818181818 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.70786347227 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138904046104 0.218282227539 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492737160749 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563263560314 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855564029708 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453432875323 0.0628817314937 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 98.500998004 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...bed to be perfect for the purpose, will all of the companys requirements be fullfilled by ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...cepting a new manufacturing plant, that could possibly be harmful to the ennvironment. In the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...the form of detailed description of the residents skill set, the job profiles, the expect...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 477.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28092243187 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1572076473 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 204.123752495 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498951781971 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 705.55239521 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5533345408 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6818181818 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.70786347227 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138904046104 0.218282227539 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492737160749 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563263560314 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855564029708 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453432875323 0.0628817314937 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 98.500998004 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.