Science and technology have enabled man to achieve the unimaginable, and we can only try to predict future developments in this space. The promt states that science and technology will one day be able to provide remedies to all of society's problems. In my opinion, I disagree with this notion and believe that technological advancements will not aid as support to eradicate certain problems, for the following reasons.
Firstly, technological improvements in umpteen sectors and industries have overshadowed the importance of humans. In other words, some job profiles have become redundant owing to technology and equipments. For instance, the manufacturing industry, be it for shoes, watches, or any other consumer goods, has seen a clear shift from human employees to automated systems. In fact, statistics show that majority of the unemployment in today's day and age is due to the takeover by machines. Moving on, a study has shown that in the next ten years, there will be more self driven cars on the road compared to ones with drivers, hence making the job of a taxi driver redundant. In this case, future development and sophistication of technology will put people out of jobs and aggrevate the issue of unemployment. Consequently, developing countries will be severly affected.
Secondly, novel scientific ideas have created a boom in the appliances and gadgets space. The ease and speed of life of the people using these gadgets has therefore improved majorly. Resultantly the stark difference between rich and poor seems to keep increasing. This can be gauged in terms of increasing poverty of aspirational segment of the society, who buy these products, when in fact they cannot afford them. Moreover, these devices have caused several health concerns due to increased sceen times, lack of body moevement and so on. This illustration clarifies that science and technology can also become the root cause of several societal problems.
However, unfathomable innovations and ideas have enabled tremendous growth and prosperity around the globe. Admittedly, hospital equipment and devices are better at detecting and curing diseases. Research proves that this has been a major contributing factor in the reduction of infant mortality rates, and the increase in expected life of people all over the world. Additionally, at-home detection with portable blood pressure monitors, blood sugar level indicators for diabetes patients, oxygen cylinders and several other devices has indubitably improved the ease for patients. Further developments in this space will only make early detection of diseases easier and quicker, hence providing solutions to several problems.
In conclusion, it is clear from the above- mentioned discussion that there is no definitive answer to this claim. It is absolutely possible that future enhancements in science and technology solve some serious issues of today, but the counter effect can not be ignored, since its impact is quite massive as well. Hence, to say that it will solve "all" of society's problems, is an overstatement.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2608.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41078838174 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97335260999 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8275210243 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168984950637 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480486408215 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602891505696 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103685068504 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697523846519 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2608.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41078838174 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97335260999 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8275210243 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168984950637 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480486408215 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602891505696 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103685068504 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697523846519 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.