A antion should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The author is right in judging the current education system is in the form of heirarchy, where top institutions are well respected, and their syllabus is moden enough. But, making the curriculum standard everywhere is a bold move, and might have opposite consequences. Although, it might help to create sense of equality among students, but it will supress the creativity and freewill of individual.
Innovation is diffusion of different domains. The house of Medici have implemented this in their practice and florence became the home for world's eminent artists, including Da Vinci, Galaleo, Raffael. But, to diffuse the learnings from distinct domains, first it is neccessary to learn different domains, sometimes even distinct domains which have no similarities at first sight. So, if standard syllabus is implemented, that is quite possible that they will miss this potential diffusion of subjects. For instance when pysiscs mergers with science of fluids, it becomes fluid dynamics and when with science of air then aerodynamics. There are millions of possibilities of potential subjects, therefore, it is quite possible that the syllabis designer neglect most of them. And, we miss the chance of innovation.
Moreover, puting a monotonous syllabus might damp one's personal creativity and interests. For example, Acting requires struggle and hardwork so very less people choose it as domain, because risk factor is high, where there are common domains like Engineering, which posseses comparativerly low risk factor. Because of this spreaded risk domain and relative distribution of students the ballance in society stays in equilibrium. What if they all have common syllabus then a potential Actor has to study Mathematics and an Engineer has to study Empathy maping. In my view the standardization of curriculum will act as the socialize govenment, where there is no space for freewill.
Although, students can select the subject of their choice once they enter the college. But, the time they spent in shcool is almost two third of their entire education, so it should be utiliza properly. Moreover, some students have higher Intelligence, so they might want to skip some years, but due to common syllabus they can not skip the subjects, which haunts them the most. And certainly, because of common education the students have never explored other possible domains to study in future, so they might get confused, while choosing their field of study in college.
In summary, A common curriculum might help students to feel more secure about future. But, fo rthe students, with very high expectations and intelligence might feel constrained. Overall effect of this move will be negative as it will slow down the rate of innovation. The best stretagy is to give free will to some of the institutions to design their own syllabus and for other institutions common curriculum. That way students also have all possible ways to study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... requires struggle and hardwork so very less people choose it as domain, because ris...
^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...andardization of curriculum will act as the socialize govenment, where there is no space for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 488, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...xplored other possible domains to study in future, so they might get confused, while choo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 311, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e best stretagy is to give free will to some of the institutions to design their own syllab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, third, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in summary, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2479.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82703642873 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535181236674 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5726622743 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.291666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5416666667 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15937231014 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436949389567 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554647620592 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855087224151 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700245676501 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.