The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Political information can affect one's lifestyle by a huge extant, so staying updated it vital for modern life. There are number of medias whoch can be accessible to stay connected to the world. After emergence of the internet, access to news has became singinificantly easy. But, that also creates a debate over the quality of news. Although, reputed publications have better quality of news, but, when we consider the adaptability, access, the speed and freedom of speech, "blogosphere" has way better advantages then its peers.
Traditionally only the reporters collects the news, and the editor selects the most promising news contents from the pile, because of space and monetory concerns. Many times the perticular group of people might lost the news most related to them. In addition, publications are believe in freedom of speech but sometimes to maintain their relations with polititions, they need to go off the record. Which afterall damps freedom of speech. Where in free media like blogs and social networking sites, like Twitter, Facebook; People are more open and can hide their own identity if the news is confidential. Although credibility of news publishing house may be high, but if we are getting same information from multiple blogs then it should be as credible as the news in news-paper.
Another reason whoch supports the social media over the news-papers is the accessibility. The internet is way cheaper for its quality and number of services. In the family of four, if people are working in different domain they might need related printed media to stay updated, but with the access of internet, they just need one internet connection. Internet provides all the information at easy access to your fingertips. There are multiple options available for selecting suitable news and furthermore it can be chnaged at anytime in future. So, when it comes to affordability, internet is way betterr then printed media.
In addition to that, the delay between the getting the news and occurance of the event has reduced because of internet, which defenitely has impact on quality of news. Now it became possible to get news at flash spped, whether it be political event, economical disclosure, celebrity event, science expo, or military mission, any kind of news can accessible just in few minitues of event. It became easy to get more eye witnesses now, even police services can stay updated related criminal issues in town, early access to weather news can help people to make arrangements early, isn't this increase in quality.
The credibilty of news is depends upon the source, but if there are multiple source of same information then we have to agree on the news. Although the quality of writing might reduced over the use of internet, but quality of news is increased. Now opinion polls have become more faster and vastly accessibe, the comments can easily describe the related events or may be suggest some opposite views. There are multiple services available which can summarise the news if one is running out of time to complete entire article, and if some blog is interesting the another service can find the similar news.
In summary, due to the genesis of social media the accessibility, speed, reliability and affordability of information impacted vastly. The quality of news might not be static as it comes from different sources but when aggregated it gives far better contentent which is free from any kind of bias.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
Political information can affect ones lifestyle by a huge extant, so staying ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...nce of the internet, access to news has became singinificantly easy. But, that also cr...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 507, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bettered', 'welled'.
Suggestion: bettered; welled
...speech, 'blogosphere' has way better advantages then its peers. Tradition...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
... to them. In addition, publications are believe in freedom of speech but sometimes to m...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...itions, they need to go off the record. Which afterall damps freedom of speech. Where...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
..., they need to go off the record. Which afterall damps freedom of speech. Where in free ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at easy access to your fingertips. There are multiple options available for selec...
^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...urthermore it can be chnaged at anytime in future. So, when it comes to affordability, in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 579, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...help people to make arrangements early, isnt this increase in quality. The credib...
^^^^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sources'?
Suggestion: sources
...n the source, but if there are multiple source of same information then we have to agr...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...ncreased. Now opinion polls have become more faster and vastly accessibe, the comments can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, in addition, in summary, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2906.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1072056239 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81223966003 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495606326889 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 936.9 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5693118119 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8846153846 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88461538462 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938619542352 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319517068951 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382236010404 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610152879125 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500709688688 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.