Whether those in power in any field should be asked to step down after five years or not is a moot topic. It can be beneficial as well as harmful to the system and public in general. Both these scenarios have their own pros and cons that must be considered before reaching any conclusion. Thus, my stance is nuanced regarding this topic. If people are allowed to stay for more than five years, it can bring prosperity to the country like no other but, in case the events take a wrong turn, it can bring chaos in the nation.
Firstly, if those in power are not allowed to stay in power for more than five years, then there is always a chance to replace that person if that person is not performing well in the assigned field. This protects the nation from a downfall. For instance, if a person who is assigned to take care of the GDP of the country but that person doesn't have enough or no experience in this field and that person doesn't perform well in his tenure, then he can be replaced after five years in his place.
Secondly, allowing only a fixed tenure will give chance to more experienced and more knowledgeable people to take the position. This can be a boon as this increase the prosperity of the nation because there is a high probability for the newcomers to perform better than the previous ones because of their credentials.
Also, a fixed time period reduces the chances of foul play. If those in power indulge in bad practices like bribery, corruption, collusion etc., they can be replaced after their tenure is over. People are not bound to them forever.
But, all this can be contested citing various reasons that can prove that those in power should be allowed to stay in power for longer periods of time.
It can be claimed that in case those in power that are performing well should be allowed to stay in power for longer period of time because they have already done something well and have uplifted the situation in the nation. There are high chances that allowing them to stay in power will be serendipitous for the nation.
Secondly, a lot of resources are wasted in the process of choosing new leaders. A lot of money is spent in organising elections. Time of the people, which is an invaluable resource is also wasted. Thus these leaders should be allowed to lead without asking them to step down.
But, allowing the leaders to stay in power can take a wrong turn as well. It is well known that the human mind is fickle. One cannot say for sure that those in power who are performing well and care about the nation will not turn bad. They can indulge in all the bad practices after they have been elected. Allowing them to stay in power for long periods of time may even give rise to dictatorship and we all know that dictatorship is a very bad form of government as evident from the history of countries like Germany and North Korea. Even the word has a foul feeling connotated to it.
Thus, to surmise, we cannot say for sure whether it will be beneficial or not to let leaders in power stay in power for more than five years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the GDP of the country but that person doesnt have enough or no experience in this fi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...xperience in this field and that person doesnt perform well in his tenure, then he can...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 118, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... be allowed to stay in power for longer period of time because they have already done somethin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... an invaluable resource is also wasted. Thus these leaders should be allowed to lead...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2503.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 561.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46167557932 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32315451665 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.393939393939 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7495511764 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7037037037 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197940290591 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594463909771 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068594581276 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105442350487 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419658761886 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.