The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree

Environmental problem is one of the biggest threat to the mankind today and is deep rooted and complex issue. The author claims that the best way to solve the environment problems caused by consumer-generated waste is to stint the amount of trash that they will accept from each household. This argument is preposterous and rife with loopholes and I don't agree with the author's opinion.
First of all, setting the limit on the amount of trash doesn't solve the inherent problem of some type of garbage being more harmful than the other. For instance, if some household generates trash that contains harmful chemicals like bleach or ammonia then a small amount of this garbage will be more harmful than a large amount of garbage that is compostable like kitchen waste.
Secondly, if the city council were to take the decision to set limits on the amount of waste that they will collect from each household then those households that generate more garbage than allowed will have undisposed garbage sitting in their bins in proximity of their homes which will cause more health and environmental issues. People might start disposing off garbage on the streets which could lead to more environmental problems.
Instead of limiting the amount of trash, the city council can raise awareness among the people about various methods of waste managament. Most of the environmental problems today are caused because of the fact that non-biodegradable waste is buried in the soil, thrown out in the water bodies or burnt. Burning of non-biodegrable garbage releases pernicious gases in the causing air pollution whereas throwing it in the water bodies causes water pollution. In order to mitigate this, the government or the city council can teach people about harmful effects that the unmanaged waste has. For instance, they can teach people about segragation of waste into biodegradable and non-biodegradable categories. The biodegradable waste can then be used for making manure by burying in the ground and the non-biodegradable waste can be treated using chemical processes to make it less harmful or it can be recycled instead of being burnt or being thrown into water.
Also, the city council could streamline the process of waste disposal. Instead of throwing out trash in the ocean or dumping the trash in land fills, they could use proper methods of waste disposal. They could use perishable trash to make manure. The garbage land fills are a source of stench for nearby residents and can pollute nearby water bodies as well causing water pollution. The fauna that consumes this water faces some serious problems. The fish could end up eating the trash thrown in the water bodies and face health problems. Humans that consume this water may catch cholera, diarrhoea and other water borne diseases.
Lastly, people should become aware of the various methods being used currently to preserve mother earth. They can follow the principle of 3Rs: reduce, reuse and recyle. People can try reducing the amount of waste that they generate. They can try to reuse certain things. For instance, instead of using take-out meal utensils just once, people could wash them and use it again instead of using new ones when they order food again. Also, the waste like plastic, glass and paper can be recycled and used again. They can also avoid using plastic and use eco-friendly things instead. In a nutshell, limiting the amount of trash collected will not solve the problems caused by consumer-generated waste. It has to be joint effort by all the people of the world.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...posterous and rife with loopholes and I dont agree with the authors opinion. First ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ith loopholes and I dont agree with the authors opinion. First of all, setting the lim...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...etting the limit on the amount of trash doesnt solve the inherent problem of some type...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...environmental problems today are caused because of the fact that non-biodegradable waste is buried in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...this water faces some serious problems. The fish could end up eating the trash thro...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, as to, for instance, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2967.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 589.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03735144312 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92639038232 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64021257499 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449915110357 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 905.4 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0710255413 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.310344828 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3103448276 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65517241379 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 5.13820224719 370% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270128936355 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805455495739 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933522479768 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165410389919 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761782997622 0.0667264976115 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.