With almost a new book or a movie coming out every day, it becomes very difficult for a reader or a movie fanatic to keep up with the new releases. There is almost no time to go back and rewatch the same movie again or read the same book again, but, every once in a while, out comes a book or a movie which is very interesting and I agree that it is more interesting to go back and read the book or watch that movie again. I believe this way for the following reasons.
First, some of the books out there have so much information that you a human being cannot imbibe all the ideas in one go. For instance, I read a book called 'The Art of Negotiation' by Chris Voss. This book has so much to teach about human mind and how to deal with negotiations in daily life. But, the book teaches about so many ways in which this can be achieved and it became very difficult for me to absorb all the ways at once. Therefore, I had to read the book thrice in order to comprehend all the methods given in the book and each time I learnt something new. Having read this book so many times, I was able to understand all the ways of negotiating mentioned in the book and now, I use all of those methods in my daily life which has proven to be very beneficial to me.
Second, while watching a movie for the first time, a person might miss the message completely that the movie is trying to convey. There are movies out there that are so cryptic that you have to watch the movie again in order to get that message. For instance, I watched a movie called 'Memento' in which two stories are going on together and they meet at the end. I wasn't able to understand this. Only after watching the movie a second time, I was able to understand the complete story of the movie because I had gained some of the context while watching the movie during the first time.
In conclusion, it's not always interesting to watch a movie or read a book the second time, but there are good books and movies out there which become more interesting while reading or watching it for the second time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...is way for the following reasons First some of the books out there have so much informatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... on together and they meet at the end I wasnt able to understand this Only after watc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...story of the movie because I had gained some of the context while watching the movie during...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ie during the first time In conclusion its not always interesting to watch a movie...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.11363636364 4.8611393121 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17954163638 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.391414141414 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 396.0 20.1344086022 1967% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1629.0 100.406767564 1622% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 396.0 20.6045352989 1922% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 73.0 5.45110844103 1339% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271329186321 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.271329186321 0.076458572812 355% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198817175022 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778957103591 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 195.9 11.7677419355 1665% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -313.54 58.1214874552 -539% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 155.4 10.1575268817 1530% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 8.04 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.83 8.01818996416 310% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 39.0 86.8835125448 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 10.002688172 530% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 160.4 10.0537634409 1595% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 25.0 10.247311828 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.