While many significant contributions built on the past achievements, it is a spurious claim that it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The past achievements lay a bedrock for future breakthroughs. It is essential for a tyro in any field to examine the previous theories and accomplishments, Particularly in science. Knowledge in science is cumulative. Individual scientist can't comprehend all aspects of a subject matter without reviewing others works and results in the same field. For instance, a physician has to study Newton's and Einstein's theories as a base to his knowledge, then he can make his own contributions.
In the other hand, studying past achievement doesn't necessarily lead to being strongly influenced by them. In contrary, securitizing previous achievements may lead to finding some deficiencies and weaknesses of them. Promoting curiosity, investigation, and discovery, Critical and revolutionary thinking is even more creative and produces significant additions to any field. Many preeminent contributions rose as a result of a revolution on the previous achievements. For instance, Copernicus revolution on the dominant belief in his time that the Sun revolved around the Earth, known as the geocentric model of the universe, lead to the phenomenal finding that the earth revolves around the sun. Indubitably, without his persistent and hard work, he wouldn't be able to defeat a proven theory, which was endorsed by the church and the scientist back then.
Past achievements are vital clues to make new and practical interventions. It precludes individuals from wasting their time on a contribution which is already optimized. In thesis research, for example, the first step is to collect the previous achievement and critically review the literature. this will enrich our background, enlighten our thinking, and give the stark for new innovations. Furthermore, many algorithms, theories or even methodologies could be employed in new contributions.
At the end, the past achievement is the base for any new contribution. It is essential to understand the past to develop the future of any field, but without being restricted to the previous findings, revolutionary thinking should be adopted when scrutinizing the past findings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nce is cumulative. Individual scientist cant comprehend all aspects of a subject mat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e other hand, studying past achievement doesnt necessarily lead to being strongly infl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ithout his persistent and hard work, he wouldnt be able to defeat a proven theory, whic...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t and critically review the literature. this will enrich our background, enlighten o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58938547486 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41978507125 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3611473393 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.315789474 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421201198794 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113726531072 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143436218564 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27632822386 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19517587879 0.0667264976115 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.