In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
World has been receiving scientists and well known researchers since it's creation. Some were written as significant contributors, and others were marked as ordinary. This grading is done on the level of anonymity of their idea, and this is the unknown nature of any idea in the field that galvanize the researcher or scientist to invade it enthusiastically, rather than feeling obstructive or impossible.
To crack any idea is the dream of every researcher of every field. Like, Facebook, the idea was quite new then, and this increased the chances of this to be happened. We could not get this social network, if similar ideas were floating in the market at that time. Similarly, the idea of the invention of hotmail was not thought by many when implemented, and this provided the programmer with the energy to work hard so that he could do it preemptively. So, we can say that everyone working in the labs in any field have at least dreamed once in his life to invade the undiscovered area.
Likewise, the difficulties due to undiscovered nature of the field , and obstructions due to humorous behavior of the mankind work as an energy drink which upraise the zest of scientist. We have examples of this in abundance. Like, Alan Turing, who introduced an innovative and groundbreaking concept, faced extreme ridicule and criticism while working on his concept. But this animosity gave him energy to work hard and eventually he did it. Similarly, Sebastian Thrun introduced the concept quite unusual in the field of autonomous vehicle, but this unusual nature galvanized him to work persistently. And no one can deny the mocking and critical attitude of the contemporaries of Albert Einstein upon his several discoveries. Hence, the difficulties and the impossibility of the work makes the task easier for a passionate worker.
Additionally, if we look at the discoveries of several things in the world, we can find that many were discovered by pure serendipity. For example, the existence of electron was felt accidentally in cathode ray tube experiment. Likewise, almost everyone knows about the discovery of gravity. Hence, this serendipitous natural discoveries have nothing to do with the impossibility, and they can never be thought off in the labs, i.e they have to be discovered as they discovered.
In contrast, for a modern day student, who does not have that much passion, might require the previous success stories to be passionate enough and work consistently.
In short, the impossibility of the idea is the bridge to make it possible if the researcher have the required passion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive or impossible. To crack any idea is the dream of every researcher of ever...
^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the energy to work hard so that he could do it preemptively. So, we can say that ...
^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... difficulties due to undiscovered nature of the field , and obstructions due to h...
^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...due to undiscovered nature of the field , and obstructions due to humorous behavi...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... due to humorous behavior of the mankind work as an energy drink which upraise th...
^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve nothing to do with the impossibility, and they can never be thought off in the...
^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: THINK_OFF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of'?
Suggestion: of
...ibility, and they can never be thought off in the labs, i.e they have to be discov...
^^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve to be discovered as they discovered. In contrast, for a modern day student, w...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... researcher have the required passion.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, likewise, look, similarly, so, then, thus, well, while, at least, for example, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10981308411 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05253277213 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535046728972 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8039694618 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112198160364 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338829830102 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385710391364 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599870705281 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024316574242 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.