The best way for a society to prepare its young people for a leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
Nations always seek great legends and leaders to lead and guide their people righteously. History has proved that no society or a bunch of group, even a clique, can succeed in their goals without strong personalities with great sense of leadership. But it is long debated that what qualities should a leader possess to make a successful nation. I strongly agree with the author that cooperation in one of the most demanded quality a leader have in order for his/her people to prosper.
Firstly, nobody in the world in any field of life could successfully lead his without cooperation. The strongest example of the uncooperative yet hated leader is Donald Trump. His exacting way of leadership is not only criticized by his companions, but also the hot issue in the media nowadays. His recent competitive and derogatory remarks about Saudi Arabia has been criticized not only by the international media, but also by his own people. Similarly if we boils down the condition to corporation, a peevish and uncooperative manager is undoubtedly face a lot of criticism on his/her back. Whereas, a manager with who praises soft and cooperative culture inside the office is the beloved by his companions.
Secondly, in any society, a person with jovial, cooperative and friendly traits is always liked by the neighbors. On the contrary, a person who always want to compete and wins in a race is not hated by his surroundings but also never become happy, as he always try to step over his competitor.
In contrast, one would argue that, without strong sense of competition, a person would lack in enthusiasm essential for the delightful career. I think competition is, no doubt, necessary to make the environment of passion, but over sense of competition kills the personalities and surroundings.
In short, to make a prosperous leader, a strong leadership is required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. I strongly agree with the author that cooperation in one of the most demanded ...
^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...onal media, but also by his own people. Similarly if we boils down the condition to corpo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'boil'
Suggestion: boil
...also by his own people. Similarly if we boils down the condition to corporation, a pe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'faced'.
Suggestion: faced
...nd uncooperative manager is undoubtedly face a lot of criticism on his/her back. Whe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...t also never become happy, as he always try to step over his competitor. In cont...
^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eader, a strong leadership is required.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, whereas, i think, in contrast, in short, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08090614887 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99998429003 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3557366717 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 5.21951772744 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117076894485 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383634256595 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359415308452 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629006194775 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427530666702 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.