In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field
It is unarguably true that, the past achievements in a particular field acts as the building block for adding a new significant contribution to the field. But I do not completely agree with the authors claim that it is impossible to make significant contribution without strongly influenced by past achievements.
Firstly, it is often said that 'There has to be a first time'. In every field there is someone who introduced new things into the field without having any past information or experience into it. For example, the Wright brothers were successful is inventing, building and flying first airplane. In this case, they had no experiences in the past still they made the impossible thing possible.
Secondly, it is not always necessary to have some past experience to significantly contribute into the field. Human race is the best example to show it. Human race is always about making the things which are unattainable possible. For example, in the initial days, cell phones only had the button displays but in recent past touchscreen displays are used . Another example comes from NASA when they first landed their spacecraft on moon it was the first time.
However, having some experience in that field always helps in increasing the productivity of the contribution as the building blocks are already ready. These experiences can be used as a base for making new advancement in the field for example, as mentioned before the wright brothers invented the airplanes and now we use the similar mechanisms in order to manufacture todays state of the art aircrafts.
To sum up, is it not impossible to make contribution into he field if there is no past experience but on the other hand the past experience could be used to future advancements in the field of study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...it is not always necessary to have some past experience to significantly contribute into the f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t experience to significantly contribute into the field. Human race is the best e...
^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ecent past touchscreen displays are used . Another example comes from NASA when th...
^^
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ps in increasing the productivity of the contribution as the building blocks are ...
^^
Line 8, column 54, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'into the field'?
Suggestion: into the field
... it not impossible to make contribution into he field if there is no past experience but on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 80, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... contribution into he field if there is no past experience but on the other hand t...
^^
Line 8, column 83, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ntribution into he field if there is no past experience but on the other hand the past experien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 125, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...st experience but on the other hand the past experience could be used to future advancements in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89382595163 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521885521886 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4356851643 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414349235957 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135240695365 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107027811873 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251995571872 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113456590319 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.