Leadership is a unique talent because it needs split-second decisions, needs futuristic view, needs unprejudistic approach and needs discerning view to make a decision for a variety of people. Such powerful process can not be accomplished without self-establised or inherent talent. Therefore, leaders those influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
Society is filled with a variety of people those who can’t be categorized into a specific type. People are mostly driven by emotional things and opinions based on that won’t work all the time in an expected way. Influx of refugees into a country has always been an issue to the country’s economy, to which a country needs to pay attention and have to take steps to provide enough support to refugees and at the same time without affecting citizens of that country. When a country tries to support/stop the influx of refugees into the country, people see the issue with emotional approach and pour opinions based on that without understanding the overall effect on country’s economy. If a leader pays attention to the shifts in people’s opinion, that country can’t achieve any solution to their problem.
In addition to that, people are easily gullible to the social media news, though they realize that internet is full of noises. People tend to believe whatever they see in social media and their opinions are influenced with what they learn from articles. The best example which can’t be missed here is the Analytica Scandal on United States 2016 election. The documented Analytica scandal shows us how the company manipulated people’s mindset and their expectation based on the locality. This proves that people are irresistible to the Social media news and this has influences on people’s opinion which can’t be reliable factor to a leader’s decision.
A commoner can’t mostly give an educated opinion on all of the nation’s problems, though they can shed some light on their locality based issues which makes complete sense. When it comes to an international issue or a problem that includes variety of people and situations, a commoner’s opinion would be very prejudiced. If we take a survey for solutions about the on going economical war between United States and China, the survey results will prove the mixed views and the incorporated issues on relying the popular opinions.
However, we can’t expect a commoner to perceive the overall views about a nation’s problems. We elect a person as a nation’s leader based on the complexities filled with the leadership and the person’s ability to deal with them. If such a leader tends to be influenced by the shifts in opinions, can accomplish little and the leadership’s quality is questionable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an expected way" with adverb for "expected"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ed on that won't work all the time in an expected way. Influx of refugees into a country has ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 58, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...os;t mostly give an educated opinion on all of the nation's problems, though they can...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 381, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...e take a survey for solutions about the on going economical war between United States an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2396.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38426966292 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10119687261 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498876404494 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2205959536 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.105263158 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4210526316 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47368421053 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128305552641 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054408388001 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590218502725 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818998774946 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172822323825 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.