In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In a group of people, there are a lot of ways to find effective solutions to common problems. Nowadays, when even the minorities conquered their right to express their opinion, dialogue is accepted as one of the most democratic path to provide actions that attend to the interests of people with a wide range of opinions. However, progress does not require discussion among people with contrasting points of view in every situation.
To start it all, it is a fact that consensus may be the best way of resolving issues for a great number of occasions. Contrasting points of view usually come from people with very different backgrounds and a variety of knowledges and expertise. Therefore, when all that is put together, the achieved solutions are more likely to be creative, contributing to the progress of the entire group.
On the other hand, assuming that all the situations require discussions in order to achieve progress is a very simple way to look at things. Different occasions require different solutions, specially if time is an important factor.
For example, one clear situation where discussion is not the ideal way to solve a problem is during a military campaign. In the common sense, military are usually very disciplined, what very often mislead people to confuse good soldiers with individuals unprovided with any critical thinking what so ever. But the fact is that, in spite of the fact that soldiers are actually trained to follow commands without questioning, this is only put in action in critical situations, when the time used for arguing about a specific subject could endanger the mission or even someone's life.
To sum up, there is no doubt that discussion is the best way to achieve progress, specially if different points of view are raised, because it shows different ways of thinking about the same problem; therefore, a creative and innovative solution is more likely to be formulated. However, the assumption that the discussion is the only way to achieve progress is false, since different situations require different approaches, and there isn't always time to make a slowly decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'someones'' or 'someone's'?
Suggestion: someones'; someone's
...ject could endanger the mission or even someones life. To sum up, there is no doubt t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 437, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...require different approaches, and there isnt always time to make a slowly decision.
^^^^
Line 9, column 462, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slowly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decision') instead of another adjective.
...hes, and there isnt always time to make a slowly decision.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, even so, for example, no doubt, in spite of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09714285714 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80768042835 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522857142857 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4049573209 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.230769231 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 5.21951772744 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167935329313 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703147812694 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814396303068 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983008234972 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334723296988 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.