Due to the advancement of technology and facile in discussing in various issues, some may claim in any situatin, people should discuss about any issues and find out cntrasting ideas. Some other may believe it is not necessary to gather people ideas for different fields that may they do not have special knowledge. I mostly agree with the latter statement and I will explain my reasons now.
To contast to the statement, it is not apropriate to ask people ideas in any situations because the specific hypothetical issue may need special knowledge to understand , and without completely understand the specific knowledge, the proposed idea may look absurd and ridicule. For instance, the structure of an engine of vehicles are very specific knowledge and people rarely know about that. Thus, people's ideas about the latest Lamborgini engine would not be efficient without understanding the basic knowledge of designing and producing steps. Therefore, people should leave specifie knowledge for experts and they can use their ideas for making decisions or comparing with other types of cars.
In addition, some group of people may be biased about specific issue and consdiering their benefits in presenting ideas. Given tranferring water of Isfahan province to Yazd province in Iran. The people of Isfahan may consider it is an unfair decision for themselves because they had more water for aggriculture while after implementing this project, thay may face some difficulties that lead to wasting their profits. On the other hand, Yazd natives may maintain that they have several problems not only in aggriculture but also drink water and this project could solve their problems. They may think, Yazd located in dry area and it is essential for them to provide water from other places that have enough water. Finally, it seems some unbiased experts could gather all of the inforamtions and consider all the advantages and disadvantages to both area and then make decision about the project.
On the other hand, some believe that there are lots of area that people could present their ideas and, in fact, their ideas could change the path of the country. For example Bergsit in the UK. Experts provide several advantages and disadvantages of Bergsit and people with different ideas compare them. Finally, people decided to change the method their country trade with other Europian countries.
In conclusion, although there are lots of situations that people should present their ideas and contrast different sides, it is irrelvant to consider th situations for all of the events. Given the situations that needs experts ideas and specific knowledge or when people are biased and they more consider their advantage instead of general benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...may need special knowledge to understand , and without completely understand the s...
^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about the latest Lamborgini engine would not be efficient without understanding t...
^^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eems some unbiased experts could gather all of the inforamtions and consider all the advan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cided to change the method their country trade with other Europian countries. In...
^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...irrelvant to consider th situations for all of the events. Given the situations that needs...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21541950113 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5986366641 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473922902494 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.583981032 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.052631579 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123792016529 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483379958897 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374350979881 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868441429875 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464452371704 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.