Some people say that the educational success of a student is the result of the work of a good teacher. Others say it depends on the character of the student.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views regarding the factors that lead students to achieve academic success. Some think that a talented teacher can play a significant role in their students’ success, while others, believe that the student’s personality determines their success. In my view, although a good teacher is helpful, student’s character should be taken alongside it.
On the one hand, talented and dedicated teachers who impart knowledge play a major role in their students’ education success. They clear doubts and provide the right context in which students can accomplish at school. Such teachers are often aware of their students’ strengths and weaknesses and they devise teaching strategies appropriate for every student. For example, they show educational documentaries to students in order to learn in a novel way. Furthermore, these schoolteachers motivate their learners to focus on the lessons and help them to overcome academic difficulties. Since they have engaged with a large number of students, they know that, for example, stress can hinder students from concentrating on their lessons. So, instructors do their best to remove this annoying factor and help their students to keep on their academic journey.
On the other hand, students’ personality is of high importance in their academic success. Those schoolers with a strong will to learn, achieve more success than their counterparts who are not willing to learn. Such motivated schoolers get the chance to build up knowledge and obtain qualifications, they never feel disappointed with the lessons and they know that every effort will be paid. Moreover, some characters necessitate taking other action to be successful in learning. Take a person with introverted traits for example. Should they face an academic problem in class, they feel shy to ask the instructor or even their classmates. Or sometimes they fail to give a presentation in front of other students, all of which contribute to get bad grades and sometimes drop out of school.
In conclusion, I think any contributing factor that can lead students to be successful in their academic life is worthwhile, so while lecturers have a great influence, the character and personality of the students should never be neglected.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a novel way" with adverb for "novel"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mentaries to students in order to learn in a novel way. Furthermore, these schoolteachers moti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 614, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ficulties. Since they have engaged with a large number of students, they know that, for example, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39154929577 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98029766496 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543661971831 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2858073847 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228288999227 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899830019151 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710016885307 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170029167191 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834542053598 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a novel way" with adverb for "novel"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mentaries to students in order to learn in a novel way. Furthermore, these schoolteachers moti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 614, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ficulties. Since they have engaged with a large number of students, they know that, for example, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39154929577 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98029766496 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543661971831 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2858073847 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228288999227 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899830019151 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710016885307 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170029167191 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834542053598 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.