There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Native animals and plants have always played crucial roles in each country, and each country has special environmental symbol. However, preserving the environment of a country may face the government and people some costs, and some maintain these costs are not justifiable to pay even for endangered animal and plant species. I completely disagree with this statement and I will explain my reasons now.
One of the important responsibilities of a government is protecting environment and specifically endangered animals and plants. Because the environment is like a treasure source for the country, and all of the activities of people base on that. For example, in Kenya, the government has special program to protect the native tiger from hunting, which is in endanger situation. The government provided special area for tigers that entrance is controlled strictly. These activities have huge cost, and due to the fact that Kenya is not a rich country, it shows the importance of this action. The reason of paying this cost is that Kenya not only knows about the importance of the environment but also the country can attract a large number of tourists to this area that compensate the cost.
Moreover, due to expansion of social media, people are vigilant of the importance of animals and plants. So, they consider protecting them even more than before. They pay cost from their budget, without any way to compensation, to protect the environment. For example, in India there are some volunteer groups that protect elephants that are injured. Apart from social behavior that persuades them to take the time, they believe the environment and specifically elephants are holy And hallowed.
On the other hand, some may reckon, it is better to expense the budget of the country for economic issue. They claim that by improving the economy people could have better life that is more important than animals and plants. Although the economic situations of people are important, I believe economic improvement would not happen without a good environmental situation in the country. If we destroy the environment, it has enormous cost for country like flood, erosion, and changing climate. Thus, even for economic issue preserving the environment is critical.
In conclusion, though some may maintain considering economy of the country is more important than the environmental issue, I reckon considering the environmental issue not only save animals and plants but also could be helpful for economy by attracting tourists and preventing environmental disaster like flood and erosion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... a treasure source for the country, and all of the activities of people base on that. For ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 723, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...onment but also the country can attract a large number of tourists to this area that compensate t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, apart from, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28223844282 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88026274398 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469586374696 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6724370909 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.55 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.55 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117969759105 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391585625316 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290753476758 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700004715501 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324879793331 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.