Native animals and plants have always played crucial roles in each country, and each country has special enviromental symbol. However, preserving the environment of a country may face the government and people some cost, and some maintain this cost is not justifiable to pay even for endangered animal and plant species. I completely disagree with this statement and I will explain my reasons now.
One of the important responsibilities of a government is protecting environment and specificily endangered animals and plants. Because the environment is like a treasure source for the country and all of the activities of people base on that. For example, in Kenia, the government has speial program to protect the native tiger from hunting, which is in endanger situation. The government provided special area for tigers that enterance are controlled restrictly. This activities have huge cost and dut to the fact that Kenia is not a rich country is very important. The reason of paying this cost is that Kenia not only knows about the importance of the environment but also the country can attract a large number of tourist to this area that compensate the cost.
Moreover, due to expansion of social media, people are vigilant of the importance of animals and plants. So, they consider to protect them even more than before. They pay cost from their budget, without any way to compensation, to perotect the environment. For example, in India there are some vulenteer groups that protect elephents which are injured in special locations. Apart from social behavior that persuade them to take time, they believe the environment and specificly elephants are holy.
On the oter hand, some may reckon, it is better to expense the budget of the country for economical issue. They claim that by improving the economy prople could have better life that is more important than animals and plants. Although the economical situation of people are important, I believe economical improvement would not happen without a good environmental country. If we destroy the environment it has enormus cost for country like flood, erosion, and changing climate. Thus, even for economical issue preserving the environment is critical.
In conclusion, though some may maintain considering economy of the conuntry is more important than the environmental issue, I reckon considering the environmental issue not only save animals and plants but also could be helpful for economy by attacting tourists and preventing enviromental disaster like flood and erosion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e a treasure source for the country and all of the activities of people base on that. For ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...at enterance are controlled restrictly. This activities have huge cost and dut to th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 700, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...onment but also the country can attract a large number of tourist to this area that compensate th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider protecting'.
Suggestion: consider protecting
...ortance of animals and plants. So, they consider to protect them even more than before. They pay co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...t than animals and plants. Although the economical situation of people are important, I be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, apart from, for example, i reckon, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27654320988 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87058037198 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486419753086 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3702935951 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.85 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131898718048 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042872467215 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322443632604 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777869311602 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305376439621 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.