Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Preserving natural environment including fauna, flora, mountains and green lands has always been a controversial issue. Some assert that these should protect as much as possible or even it is possible try to resurgence the situation, while some maintain that current generation also could take advantages from valuable environmental situations. I mostly agree with the former group and I will explain my reasons now.
First of all, flora and fauna are very valuable for the environmental area and if one of them would extinct then it would not reversible. Besides, this extinction could disturb the balance of the ecosystem of the area and lead to disaster. For instance, Iranian lions had been extinct even before trying to preserving them and it is impossible to reverse this situation. As a result of this event, the number of wolves increased dramatically because the wolves did not have any rivals any more. These wolves attack villages and hunt children as consequence of disturbing the balance of ecosystem.
Moreover, wilderness environment could attract tourists to the area that would lead to gain money and improve the economy of the area. Governments with facilitating situation for inhabitants and tourists could attract tourists from around the world more than before. These days nature tourism industry play crucial roles in economy of some countries. For instance, Kenya the African country with rich wilderness environment can attract more than one million tourists every year. It leads to attract inhabitants to some jobs related to tourism like guide tour or accommodation.
On the other hand, some claim that some society lives in poor situation and preserving the nature may not make sense for them because they mostly worry about widespread diseases, scarcity of foods and their initial needs. They exemplify Guinea, an African country, that has rich soil of diamond but they live in awful situations. The current generation could take advantages of this wealth even it lead to destroy some part of the environment. I could not reject their assertion, however, even if there is not any other option unless destroy some part of environment, it is possible to decrease this destruction as less as possible.
In conclusion, although you may find some situations that use the wilderness for taking advantage and economic gain like Gineh, it mostly acknowledges preserving the environment and trying to resurgence its destruction. Preserving the environment could have advantages for us like attracting nature tourists or prevent disaster like disturbing ecosystem of the area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...round the world more than before. These days nature tourism industry play crucial ro...
^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
... take advantages of this wealth even it lead to destroy some part of the environment...
^^^^
Line 4, column 620, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...le to decrease this destruction as less as possible. In conclusion, although you ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32360097324 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82109837299 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518248175182 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5057187648 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.157894737 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220187988511 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683549382573 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423576324688 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124335033559 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310049170299 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.