Essay topics:
Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
gg
Votes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...reas and using these areas to burgeon a nations economy. Some nations have passed laws ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: MAJOR_BREAKTHROUGH[1]
Message: Use simply 'breakthrough'.
Suggestion: breakthrough
...mpering the cancerous cells. This was a major breakthrough which could not have been possible if t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1175, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... be way more that using the forests for economical activities. Wilderness areas can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...eing able to use forests as a source of economical activities can be levied.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, then, apart from, as to, talking about, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3143.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 621.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06119162641 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.991980728 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78401828823 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463768115942 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1003.5 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.9934509134 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.72 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.84 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294737396524 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999332105088 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103953556524 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210784587025 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125016118579 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.