As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Using technology is increasing more than ever and it could provide more convenient situations for all of us. Although it provides easy conditions for us like telecommunication and facilitating transportation, the deterioration effects on mental abilities have always been a disputable issue. Some believe this trend would destroy the problem-solving skill of the human race.
Technology provides a wide range of facilities for humankind which enables us to expedite different jobes and decrease mundane activities. For example, engineers are not struggling with interminable calculations or tedious drawing process, these activities have been done by computers and free time for them to think for other important problems. Also, people use software in everyday activities such as finding routes or calculating the price of the shopping list and they can free their minds to broaden their relationships with their families. Some may believe these activities which were applied by human could help to improve the mind's ability whereas people are struggling with the most difficult problems than before ranging from finding a substitute for fossil fuel to diminishing greenhouse gases.
Social media provides a great foundation for sharing different ideas around the globe. People can be familiar with different ideas and broaden their horizons which were impossible last decades. For example, one may ask about a problem from anywhere and some could introduce some solutions that they had used. On the other hand, critics may denote that people do not try to solve the problems, they just google about their problem and use other people's solutions. Although it may deteriorate for some people which overuse these abilities of technologies, some who are interested in solving problems try to find a new one and solve it through the Internet.
In contrast to the statement, the gaming industry provides a wide range of games which engross various people ranging from child to housewives. This industry provides a great feature for imagination and improves the brain's ability. Teenagers can locate themselves in different situations and try to find a way to cope with the steps. Likewise, it could help them to improve the coordinating body and mind as they are playing. However, some teachers believe it can make pupils lazy in doing homework, some experts reckon it has several benefits for appropriate usage.
Modern life provides different facilities for humankind and each person can use it differently. As some may use it to ask others for a solution, the others could use it to free their time to think more critical issues or have more time with their families.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...tionships with their families. Some may believe these activities which were applied by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'minds'' or 'mind's'?
Suggestion: minds'; mind's
...lied by human could help to improve the minds ability whereas people are struggling w...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brains'' or 'brain's'?
Suggestion: brains'; brain's
...eature for imagination and improves the brains ability. Teenagers can locate themselve...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, may, so, whereas, for example, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31132075472 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83954330579 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514150943396 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6409765356 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.526315789 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249061900204 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081488321084 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480507170733 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152104413784 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315299031067 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.