The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human mind and machine superior has always been a controversial issue recent years. Due to advance in technology machines are improving every day and now they can do much more than before. So, some may believe machines are superior to human mind. In my point of view, human mind has more abilities than machines for two reasons.
First of all, machines are designed by human and how much they are intelligent shows the intelligence of inventors. By the other words, the abilities of a machine is a sign of the inventor's mind ability. As the statement mentioned, they are just a tools that human invents to make their jobs easier. For example, calculator may do some mathematical operation much faster than human but it does not mean the superior of calculator to the human. It shows the human intelligence that uses some tools to facile and expedite his or her work.
Moreover, even we consider machines as the latest supercomputers; again human mind is superior to machines. Because these computers are design by humans and they tried to transfer their ideas and point of views in solving problems to the computers. So, the computers do not have any independent view and their views inheritence from human minds. For instance, during the past decades we can find a lot of problems and scientific questions that solved by changing the views to the problem. We can name discovery of vaccine that scientist find a new way for fighting disease while it may not happen in computers. Computer just search between different solutions that are designed for.
On the other hand, some maintain some machines like supercomputers could defeat human and it is an indication of superiority of machines. For example, they claim some supercomputers that not only could defeat ordinary people but also could win against some masters. However, this example shows the advancement of computers but not superiority of computers to human mind. Because, supercomputers can search between thousands of solutions faster than human and they could not design a new solution. In addition, supercomputers fail to win against some masters anyway.
In conclusion, in my point of view, although machines and specially supercomputers have fast advancement in recent decades, human mind is superior to machines due to the ability of human to think to the problems in different views if necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a tool' or simply 'tools'?
Suggestion: a tool; tools
... the statement mentioned, they are just a tools that human invents to make their jobs e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06138107417 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83813036025 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462915601023 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6294683844 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2380952381 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246798300459 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932322128474 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678300342925 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166480581202 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575354532894 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.