A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Some people believe the curriculum of all students should be the same until the end of high school while others believe it could not be useful for all. Because pupils may choose different majors or have different purposes for their life that this procedure could not assure success for them. I strongly disagree with the constant curriculum for all pupils and I will explain why.
The main reason of opposers of the same curriculum is that teenagers have different favorites and they would choose various majors for their life or even they may decide to enter to work market without going to the university. Therefore, it is not plausible to force pupils to learn some curriculum which may never use in their future life or academic career. For instance, the curriculum for students who want to be a lawyer should be completely different from potential engineers. Prospect lawyers should focus on human and mental science like philosophy whereas engineers may better concentrate on Physics, Mathematics, and Chemistry which would be helpful for academic their careers.
On the other hand, advocates claim that teenagers may change their decision in high school and want to study different majors in the university and this change would be difficult or maybe impossible for them. If they study the same curriculum in the high school period, they have enough time to survey for different major and when they became aware of all the possibilities then they can choose their major wisely. Although their idea looks sage at first glance, in fact, they generalize some exceptions to all students. There are a few students who may change their major at the end of high school and we can assume this trend for all students or even a major quantity of them.
Finally, apart from the majors which students would elect for themselves, some courses are necessary for all of the students and should be included in the curriculums of all majors. These courses could broaden the horizons of students and would be helpful for their everyday life. For example, History could help them to be aware of descendants' events and earning some ideas for political views. Likewise, fundamental Mathematics, Literature could be useful for everyday activities.
In conclusion, while some individuals may provide some reasons to support the same curriculum for all students such as changing majors at the end of high school, having various curriculums for different students with different potential major selection would be so beneficial for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 106, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...mselves, some courses are necessary for all of the students and should be included in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, apart from, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13526570048 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57802239024 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454106280193 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3460703212 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.875 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 5.21951772744 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186198466037 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828633632928 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474126847306 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133359886767 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142097988717 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.