Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Governing according principles or public opinion has always been a controversial issue. While some people believe the govenment should act according the people's ideas, others reckon principles are more improtant than public's ideas. I will explain both ideas now.
Advocates of acting according public's opinion believes this method is more likely to be fair. Due to the fact that the government is the average of public opinion thus government should act according people's ideas. In their idea, the government should address people idea's for any decision. For example, to investing in a project or political decision the government should consider about public ideas and then make decision.
On the othe hand, advocates of principles claim that all of the people are not expert in any fields that are necessary for governing the country so they may not good referrence for making decision. Furthermore, the govenment is elected according to voting in democratic society so people decided about the main policy of the government and parlimant also is another way to reflect people's idea and asking public for any decicion may not approporiate idea. In addition, in some occasions the best decision for the country may not approve by the public but the government should act according to principles, which examined by scientific methods, if he want to assure the future of the country and citizens.
However, considering a mild opinion might be more reasonable than the aforementioned procedures. Some maintain that in most of the times acting according to the principles are reasonable and would gain convincing result but in some exception the idea of public should be considered even if it is against principles. They believe this process help people to be aware of their mistakes and help them to improve their beliefs. For example in the Britain, people decided to seperate from the Euorpe committe, while this decision may be against the princple and may cause some detrimental effect on economy of Britain, the government accepted this idea and it definetly help them to be aware of consequences of their decisions if there is any.
In conclusion, although actiong according princple have several advantages in comparison with public's opinion, a mild method that act according the principles and sometimes consider public's ideas could have more merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...s now. Advocates of acting according publics opinion believes this method is more li...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...and, advocates of principles claim that all of the people are not expert in any fields tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...h examined by scientific methods, if he want to assure the future of the country and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2671957672 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74868234107 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468253968254 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.417571727 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.733333333 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205089188969 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828377341973 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408196191339 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128839977838 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419132363406 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.