As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Using technology is increasing more than ever and it could provide more convenient situations for all of us. Although it provides easy conditions for us like telecommunication and facilitating transportation, the deterioration effects on mental abilities have always been a disputable issue. Some believe this trend would destroy the problem-solving skill of the human race.
Technology provides a wide range of facilities for humankind which enables us to expedite different jobes and decrease mundane activities. For example, engineers are not struggling with interminable calculations or tedious drawing process, these activities have been done by computers and free time for them to think for other important problems. Also, people use software in everyday activities such as finding routes or calculating the price of the shopping list and they can free their minds to broaden their relationships with their families. Some may believe these activities which were applied by human could help to improve the mind's ability whereas people are struggling with the most difficult problems than before ranging from finding a substitute for fossil fuel to diminishing greenhouse gases.
Social media provides a great foundation for sharing different ideas around the globe. People can be familiar with different ideas and broaden their horizons which were impossible last decades. For example, one may ask about a problem from anywhere and some could introduce some solutions that they had used. On the other hand, critics may denote that people do not try to solve the problems, they just google about their problem and use other people's solutions. Although it may deteriorate for some people which overuse these abilities of technologies, some who are interested in solving problems try to find a new one and solve it through the Internet.
Another point that worth to mention is that in any condition some people find a way to evolve their abilities and some others prefer to use other findings. To examine technology for deterioration problem solving, it is necessary to consider both of them. Technology provides vast tools for interested people to share their solutions or using other investigations to find an answer to their questions while it was time-consuming or even impossible without technology and they can save their time to solve new problems which expand their minds' abilities. However, some may use the Internet for even basic questions so, it does not mean deteriorate human ability because these types of people may have never tried to solve a problem if they have lived in the past decades.
Modern life provides different facilities for humankind and each person can use it differently. As some may use it to ask others for a solution, the others could use it to free their time to think more critical issues or have more time with their families.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...tionships with their families. Some may believe these activities which were applied by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'minds'' or 'mind's'?
Suggestion: minds'; mind's
...lied by human could help to improve the minds ability whereas people are struggling w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25217391304 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83858773693 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484782608696 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 774.9 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9721128608 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.222222222 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235911413243 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919703613749 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439228438467 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159940650865 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200132498868 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.