In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Due to the advancement of technology and facile in discussing various issues, some may claim in any situation, people should discuss any issues and find out contrasting ideas. Some others may believe it is not necessary to gather people's ideas for different fields that they may not have special knowledge about. I mostly agree with the latter statement and I will explain my reasons now.
In contrast to the statement, it is not appropriate to ask people's ideas in any situation because the specific hypothetical issue may need special knowledge to understand, and without completely understand the specific knowledge, the proposed idea may look absurd and ridiculous. For instance, the structure of an engine of vehicles is very specific knowledge and people rarely know about that. Thus, people's ideas about the latest Lamborgini engine would not be efficient without understanding the basic knowledge of designing and producing steps. Therefore, people should leave specific knowledge for experts and they can use their ideas for making decisions or comparing with other types of cars.
Also, some groups of people may be biased about a specific issue and considering their benefits in presenting ideas. Given transferring water of Isfahan province to Yazd province in Iran. The people of Isfahan may consider it is an unfair decision for themselves because they had more water for agriculture, while after implementing this project, they may face some difficulties that lead to wasting their profits. On the other hand, Yazd natives may maintain that they have several problems not only in agriculture but also drink water and this project could solve their problems. They may think, Yazd is located in a dry area and it is essential for them to provide water from other places that have enough water. Finally, it seems some unbiased experts could gather all of the information and consider all the advantages and disadvantages to both areas and then make the decision about the project.
On the other hand, some believe that there are lots of areas that people could present their ideas and their ideas could change the path of the country. For example Brexit in the UK, experts provide several advantages and disadvantages of Brexit, and people with different ideas compare them. Finally, people decided to change the method of their country trade with other European countries.
In conclusion, although there are lots of situations that people should present their ideas and contrast different sides, it is irrelevant to consider these situations for all of the events. Given the situations that need experts’ ideas and specific knowledge or when people are biased and they more consider their advantage instead of general benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eems some unbiased experts could gather all of the information and consider all the advant...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...levant to consider these situations for all of the events. Given the situations that need ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22675736961 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62415400739 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473922902494 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4805111903 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.055555556 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.21951772744 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12689669462 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513923120511 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414472663684 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911273170079 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521933840147 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.