Some people say that the educational success of a student is the result of the work of a good teacher. Others say it depends on the character of the student. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views regarding the factors that lead students to achieve academic success. Some think that a talented teacher can play a significant role in their students’ success, while others, believe that the student’s personality determines their success. In my view, although a good teacher is helpful, student’s character should be taken alongside it.
On the one hand, talented and dedicated teachers who impart knowledge play a major role in their students’ education success. They clear doubts and provide the right context in which students can accomplish at school. Such teachers are often aware of their students’ strengths and weaknesses and they devise teaching strategies appropriate for every student. For example, they show educational documentaries to students in order to learn in a novel way. Furthermore, these schoolteachers motivate their learners to focus on the lessons and help them to overcome academic difficulties. Since they have engaged with a large number of students, they know that, for example, stress can hinder students from concentrating on their lessons. So, instructors do their best to remove this annoying factor and help their students to keep on their academic journey.
On the other hand, students’ personality is of high importance in their academic success. Those schoolers with a strong will to learn, achieve more success than their counterparts who are not willing to learn. Such motivated schoolers get the chance to build up knowledge and obtain qualifications, they never feel disappointed with the lessons and they know that every effort will be paid. Moreover, some characters necessitate taking other action to be successful in learning. Take a person with introverted traits for example. Should they face an academic problem in class, they feel shy to ask the instructor or even their classmates. Or sometimes they fail to give a presentation in front of other students, all of which contribute to get bad grades and sometimes drop out of school.
In conclusion, I think any contributing factor that can lead students to be successful in their academic life is worthwhile, so while lecturers have a great influence, the character and personality of the students should never be neglected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2614.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 469.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57356076759 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07390076862 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 176.041082164 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603411513859 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2137852122 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.7 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.45 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12901157789 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044638034338 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037507404743 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992841529782 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328219268533 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 78.4519038076 208% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.