In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Recently, many people wonder how to make progress in their society or individuals. Some people believe that progress results from discussion among people who have contrasting points of ideas. From my perspective, I agree with such view if the people who enter the discussion have enough experience or abilities to analyze the details of related things, and there are many factors contributing to the step of the progress in the reality, e.g., the careful background investigation and the experience from the predecessor.
First of all, the discussion or meeting among those people who have enough knowledge with various ideas do facilitate the progress of development, since nobody will know every kinds of information and we have to combine all efficient genius to our work. An appropriate example cannot be far away. For example, Jack Ma is one of the most famous businessmen around the world, who funded the biggest electronic payment company in China. However, Mr. Ma did not know anything about the software and coding skills. So how could he creat so powerful high-tech company? The answer is that Ma respect the discussion of the employees and glad to hear some useful suggestions from them, though Ma held opposite views.
Furthermore, the importance of the background of the advisors cannot be overemphasized, because some practical suggestions should be provided by experts instead of novices. For example, some governers in developing countries always ask their scientists to finsh those impossible and inpractical projects. Although such projects' goals were discussed among governers, the lack of common sense make the objectives of those projects become a joke.
Finally, there are many other factors in need of further consideration in order to enhance the progress of our project. For example, we should investigate the background and other associated information before starting the projects. Moreover, the forerunners' suggestion should be taken to get rid of unpredicted troubles and contribute to the easier road to the final progress. Otherwise, nobody will arrive at the destination or make progress without experiencing terrible struggle.
Overall, I strongly agree the view that the discussions or talks among people who have different views are necessary for making progress. However, without enough related background and information, we may fall into trouble without careful guidence.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'forerunners'' or 'forerunner's'?
Suggestion: forerunners'; forerunner's
...re starting the projects. Moreover, the forerunners suggestion should be taken to get rid o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92501148451 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569518716578 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6683586922 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199668990579 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604864113486 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812460733485 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116348169842 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703601243523 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'forerunners'' or 'forerunner's'?
Suggestion: forerunners'; forerunner's
...re starting the projects. Moreover, the forerunners suggestion should be taken to get rid o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92501148451 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569518716578 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6683586922 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199668990579 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604864113486 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812460733485 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116348169842 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703601243523 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.