In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement
and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you
should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Progress is supposed to be achieved faster when diverse opinions are presented. It provides distinct solutions to problem which unlocks multiple realms of opportunities. It prevents the work from being monotonous and being headed to single direction as well as helps to achieve the target fast. I support the opinion and will mention two points in support of that.
First of all, various remarkable progress or development in any sector comes from big corporations or governments. They are by the management or politician’ chosen from masses having diverse opinion so denoting the insights of almost all members. For instance, In democracy there is certain place for opposition and the views of them doesn't go unheard. The opposition party complains and criticizes the governing party this forces the decision to be made in favor of people not the party alone. Without opposition democracy feels like autocracy. Opposition plays vital role to ensure all people are considered while maintaining laws and policies by ruling party.
The principle can be applied from large scale countrywide corporations to even small startups. For instance, the new approach of programming called peer programming, is developed aiming better methodology for software development process and ensuring faster goal achievement then previous procedures. In this people in group perform a same task supporting each other simultaneously. The main motto is to obtain code bug free, faster and properly written. Similar approach is also used in analysis phase of project via brain storming ideas to obtain the best solutions of the problem.
On the other hand, people can disagree that too much of diverse opinion may result in conflicts or wars. But attaining to a common conclusion can significantly reduce the chance of conflict later on, as everyone was allowed to present their concern from the same ground without preference to any side.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ce for opposition and the views of them doesnt go unheard. The opposition party compla...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, well, while, as to, for instance, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36303630363 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85762463981 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650165016502 0.4932671777 132% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4355183208 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795444055475 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0235999586803 0.0831039109588 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203667437392 0.0758088955206 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439061320504 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135824214667 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ce for opposition and the views of them doesnt go unheard. The opposition party compla...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, well, while, as to, for instance, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36303630363 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85762463981 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650165016502 0.4932671777 132% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4355183208 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795444055475 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0235999586803 0.0831039109588 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203667437392 0.0758088955206 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439061320504 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135824214667 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.