R. robustus
Both author and lecturer discuss whether R.robustus can hunt dinosaur or not. The former argues against the statement using three reasons, whereas the latter contradicts all these points.
First of all, the passage states R.robustus is too small to hunt dinosaur as it’s size is almost equal to that of a domestic cat. However, the listening rebuts stating although the size of R. robustus was small it was big enough to hunt small dinosaur and babies of other large dinosaurs. In addition, R. robustus was twice the size of small dinosaurs and baby dinosaurs so, it is likely that they were hunted.
Second of all, the reading claims R.robustus suited more for scavanging than hunting. On the other hand, the professor counters this claim by mentioning of similar predator. Tasmanian Devil, a similar creature with short legs and little size but active in moving, was a successful hunter which signifies the possibility that R.robustus with similar characterisitics was successfull in hunting dinosaur.
Finally, the text asserts no real evidence was found supporting the claim that dinosaur was hunted. In constrast, the lecturer argues expecting tooth marks in bone of dinosaur contained in the stomach of R. robustus was illogical. As R. robustus contained powerful jaws it was able to swallow big pieces and smaller preys directly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, whereas, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67584582733 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606481481481 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6571604158 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293001060854 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119588913191 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129756662017 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189082506452 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264136574985 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.