To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author of the statement points out that a successful leader must follow the highest ethical and moral standards. While, in general, I concur with such an assertion, as leaders who maintain high ethical standards can be the role models of their people. However, a relentless pursuing of the highest moral behaviours may also lead to undesired results.
Admittedly, political leaders’ moral standards do have a crucial impact on their political career. For example, Donald Trump, the Republican nominee of 2016 president election of the United States, are now facing an overwhelming criticises about his previous insult of women. Many people even claim that whether they should let their children to see the news about Donald Trump, who has a very low standard of his moral behaviours, because they are afraid of their children being wrongly guided by Trump’s saying and behaviour. Thus, it is important for government officials to maintain high standards of their behaviours, because people, especially the young generations, tend to micmic their leaders’ words and behaviours.
However, every coin has two sides. If we emphasise too much on the proper behaviours of political leaders, it may have an opposite effect on our society. The main focus of a government and its officials should be economic prosperity, cultural flourish and the high living standards of its people. If the public have set too much regulations to their leaders, they are more likely to behave what the public want instead of scientifically planning for the long term development of the society. Moreover, it is almost impossible that public officials always behave properly, as they are also common people to some extent.
In my point of view, our society should figure out a more comprehensive evaluation system for public officials. Such a system need to add moral behaviours, economic development and ordinary people living standards into consideration. To achieve the standards listed above, officials will maintain a balance between their daily behaviours and the economic and cultural tasks. In this way, the pursuit of high moral standards is based on the development of the society instead of condescending it.
In sum, it is unnecessary to require public leaders to maintain the highest moral standards, instead, they should behave properly in front of the public, but more importantly, their main focus should be the prosperity of their country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...on of the United States, are now facing an overwhelming criticises about his previous insult of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
... an opposite effect on our society. The main focus of a government and its officials shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... its people. If the public have set too much regulations to their leaders, they are ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...the public, but more importantly, their main focus should be the prosperity of their count...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240990990991 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.108108108108 0.157235817809 69% => OK
Adjectives: 0.119369369369 0.0880659088768 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0585585585586 0.0497285424764 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0653153153153 0.0444667217837 147% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.114864864865 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0225225225225 0.0406280797675 55% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88084385997 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0247747747748 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0045045045045 0.0016655270985 270% => OK
Determiners: 0.0855855855856 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0225225225225 0.0249443105267 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00675675675676 0.0148568991511 45% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2457.0 2732.02544248 90% => OK
No of words: 388.0 452.878318584 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.3324742268 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.440721649485 0.366273622748 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309278350515 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234536082474 0.200843997647 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154639175258 0.132149295362 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88084385997 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 219.290929204 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520618556701 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 57.3666689454 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8235294118 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8637342085 59.4972553346 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.529411765 141.124799967 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 53.7513644633 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.63106796117 1.64882698954 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334881111202 0.391690518653 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102552918165 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0871047722241 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.532082401947 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18659060518 0.149214159877 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142903411909 0.161403998019 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861071663081 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.396527871925 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0465824216806 0.0692045440612 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260552101536 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640737633811 0.0653680567796 98% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.