We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Most people are in favour of views that are similar with their own thoughts, as they can avoid further arguments with different views. However, they also lose the opportunity to learn from other people’s unique understanding about specific topics.
It is hard for people who hold opposite opinions to have a rational discussion. One of the human natures is that people tend to convince others to accept their ideas. With such a nature, they will try every method to achieve their goal and it easily leads to a fierce quarrel instead of an opportunity to intake great thoughts from others. For example, social media like Facebook or Twitter today are full of bad words between people who have different views about current hot topics. This only causes the chaos and rage in people's minds other than effective learning process.
However, people can acquire certain knowledge from others’ views, because it’s a good way to inspire deeper thoughts. When looking at something in the first place, people are more likely to think in traditional ways and draw superficial conclusions. It is until different views appear they will find their previous thoughts are so naive. With the help of contradictory opinions, people can reevaluate their ideas and think deeply to make some adjustments to their previous thoughts. In this way, incisive and eloquent thoughts are formed which can be more widely accepted. For example, debating contest is a typical process to learn from others. Debaters need to listen carefully to seek for their competitors’ defects and make the best use of them to win the debate.
Moreover, different views enable people to think comprehensively. People have to admit their limitations towards specific areas. It is common that one person only thinks of one or two aspects of a topic, which is a natural shortcoming of human being. As for the method to overcome this defect, trying to absorb thoughts from others is the best way. People who want to think comprehensively have many sources to learn from others, such as following others’ social media accounts or reading books and magazines. If people are not willing to accept others’ intellectual views, they may be isolated from the outside world and left behind by the wiser ones.
In conclusion, although opposite views may result in fruitless arguments, they also encourage people to think deeply and comprehensively about different things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Most people are in favour of views that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nderstanding about specific topics. It is hard for people who hold opposite ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her than effective learning process. However, people can acquire certain know...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... best use of them to win the debate. Moreover, different views enable people ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and left behind by the wiser ones. In conclusion, although opposite views m...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'as for', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in the first place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236203090508 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.158940397351 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.123620309051 0.0880659088768 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0397350993377 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0441501103753 0.0444667217837 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108167770419 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0198675496689 0.0406280797675 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.76031343067 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0507726269316 0.030933414821 164% => OK
Particles: 0.00220750551876 0.0016655270985 133% => OK
Determiners: 0.0529801324503 0.0997080785238 53% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0176600441501 0.0249443105267 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0154525386313 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2478.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 395.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27341772152 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270886075949 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182278481013 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111392405063 0.132149295362 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76031343067 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546835443038 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 62.1639275695 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8095238095 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.358765808 59.4972553346 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.619047619048 0.674092028746 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 45.8981314045 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.5 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306959695115 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0656677063401 0.123202303941 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0534584320607 0.077325440228 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.476843145909 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164194988462 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117637027479 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425489029433 0.0892212321368 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.34826353002 0.385218514788 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.117538294939 0.0692045440612 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20826924501 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050937566049 0.0653680567796 78% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.