When we evaluate the knowledge from whom we can learn more, Firstly, there are some merits from both of the people who agree and disagree our own views. So this essay that we can learn much more from people share opposite ideas with us is not comprehensive and tactful. Being humble is a good personality when we want to learn something from others, as an old Chinese saying, "When I walk with other two people, there must be one of my teacher. If people want to amplify the benifits of learning, do not care about whether the people agree or disagree with your ideas. Every coin has two sides. So I will address my views in two points.
Firstly, we should be grateful that there is someone who disagree with the views of our own. To be optimistic, it is a good start for deabting, which maybe conflict while valuable for the outcome sometimes, even if there is no result from the discssion, we gained the chance to practice our brains. To be more advancing, the debate mentioned above is the simple original procedure of scientific development which conforms lots of fields. That is to say, the scientific development mostly evolved by the controversy and debate among people who shared different views. The controversy drove the science to move on. Once the Pluto was the ninth biggest planet of the Solar System. While some of the scientists challenged this facts due to some imprecise calculation from other issues when relates to the Solar System's nine biggest planets. For decades, the debate kept on. The answer was disclosed recently by more advancing calculations of scientists. The history of astronomy revised, just like hundreds years ago, the earthcentroism is corrected by heliocentroism. On the other hand, given that what I empahsized is opposite to the essay, while that is not to devaluate the importance of learning from the people who share the same views with us.
Because this is not an all-or-nothing essay, so it would be hasty to support either one of them.
Secondly, no matter who we learn more from, the basical requirement is that we have the perception of the merit from others. So to be more specific, we should cultivate ourselves with enough knowledge then to find out others' merit we can learn from. When it comes with the comparison of which group is better, the basic requirement should be the tool for us to find which one is superior to the other. For example, you may find it hard to discuss quantum mechanics if you do not know it, even if the people in front of you is Stephen Hawking.
In conclusion, I do not agree with this essay partly because this essay should not confine our desire to learn more from others, in my opinion, either of the people who agree or disagree could be our better teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntroversy drove the science to move on. Once the Pluto was the ninth biggest planet ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nth biggest planet of the Solar System. While some of the scientists challenged this ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ggest planet of the Solar System. While some of the scientists challenged this facts due to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73443983402 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57895083593 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48755186722 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2142235581 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2173913043 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9565217391 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385523916584 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105171974872 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901958875104 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202487313349 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117298843027 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.