To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In

When it comes to the definition of “effectiveness”, people in general believe that doing things with the best solution within limited time, and that is “effectiveness”. In addition, quite a lot of people agree that a leader is a person who lead other people to a certain direction. Therefore, is the character of effectiveness that a leader should equip necessary? Or, is the quality of having highest ethical and moral standards that an effective leader must have?
To begin with, people have different viewpoints toward standards. In other words, standards vary in every mind of every human. From the cultural perspective, in my country, in order to have promising future of getting a well-paid career, merely maintaining at top of class is all people should do. This is because our domestic companies have tendency to hire students graduated from prestigious school. However, in other country, academic performance is not enough to enter well-known company. Practical skills such as internships or the ability to combine academic knowledge into developing useful tool are indispensable as well. As a result, the value of career preparation differs in every country, not to mention the “highest” ethical and moral standards.
Moreover, if a leader is lack of ethics or morality, yet the leader leads the public toward prosperous future, then the leader is deserved to be called as an “effective” leader by the public. To illustrate this point, take our last president for example. Our last president certainly led our country to a promising and prosperous future by establishing several significant establishments, such as he implemented laws to protect intellectual properties, international airports that is primarily used today. Nevertheless, he hid billions of money, which people paid through taxes, and this is definitely unethical at all. Yet, his contributions to our country could be marked as an effective leader.
On the contrary, if an effective leader has a better sense of ethics or morality, citizens could look up to their leaders. That is, citizens regard their effective leaders as their role model, who can not only lead the public to promising future, but also have ethics and morality that modern people usually are scant.
In conclusion, all the analysis points to an unmistakable perspective is that an effective leader do not necessarily have the highest ethical and moral standards.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
... equip necessary? Or, is the quality of having highest ethical and moral standards that an eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39583333333 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44430749546 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5014707616 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.052631579 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6315789474 5.21951772744 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202067310751 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654742884363 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587871956617 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126732349536 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427336445989 0.0667264976115 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.