nowadays, it is controversial whether an effective leader must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. Some people hold a view that a public official must be ethical and moral since he or she should be the face of the nation. However, I personally argue that having the highest moral and ethical standards cannot be a pivotal factor that qualifies an effective leader; his or her achievement should also be the factor that we should concentrate on.
On the one hand, an efficacious chief who have the highest ethical and moral standards usually gain more admiration from society. For example, in my country, Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh was considered as an acclaimed politician in my country. As the first chairman of Vietnam who took a vital role in establishing independence for my country, he has been highly lauded as one of the most effective and greatest leaders in the country. As the chairman, he denied accepting a salary and lived in a small house so that he could maintain his image of a selfless leader. Moreover, he used to be a model of a modest and saving leader. Because of his aspects of moral and ethnic, many Vietnamese still praise him as one of the most powerful and effective leaders of Vietnam. Therefore, maintaining the features of high moral and ethnic standards can be a prerequisite to becoming an effective leader.
On the other hand, there are some leaders who are regarded as effective leader despite their low ethical and moral value. For example, in world war II, when there were many attacks happening in many countries which not only damaged the property but also cause detrimental effects to the people in these countries. As a result, there were many secret campaigns and experiments which were processing with the permission of the head of the countries try to develop the novel weapons and biochemical could defeat the enemies. Although these decisions could be not moral and ethical solutions, the result of it was to stop the war and protect their citizens so these leaders still have been esteemed by their people. Therefore, the achievements of a public official can also be an important factor to measure the effectiveness of the leader.
In addition, a leader sometimes has to face the real-life dilemmas between that he wants to keep his ethical and moral standards or he has to sacrifice his image to protect something more important. For example, In the Vietnam War, the Vo Nguyen Giap leader used to be considered as an immoral general when he decided withdrew all the army when everything already was set. Although his decision wasted not only time, money and some soldiers died when doing that, finally when he won the battle in DienBienPhu castle which is the one markable milestone of Vietnam history and play an important part of leading to America withdraw the enemy out of Vietnam. Therefore, simply having the highest moral and ethical aspects cannot be enough to determine the effectiveness of a public official.
In conclusion, maintaining the highest ethical and moral standards should is no indicator of an effective leader. Other aspects such as an achievement should be taken into consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
nowadays, it is controversial whether an effecti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom society. For example, in my country, Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh was considered as a...
^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in my country. As the first chairman of Vietnam who took a vital role in establi...
^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...hest ethical and moral standards should is no indicator of an effective leader. Ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2634.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95112781955 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74951365066 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456766917293 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 842.4 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7315589849 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30129227144 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113177383992 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728979799488 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199097928111 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620519603635 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.