One of the most essential factors which contribute to thriving for a country is the political leader 's view. When some people assert that government must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise, there is another opinion that these leaders need have the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. From my point of view, I believe that the political leaders' objectives must be concerned towards the welfare of the people but they need to stick some certain principles and objectives which make them get esteem from people.
On the one hand, political leaders who adhere to a cause are venerated by the people and they become the center of attention. They are deemed as heroes by the people who in many ways try to emulate their behavior and consider them as their role models. Therefore, sticking to a particular cause often gains acclaims for the political leaders and they become icons in due course of time. For example, Ho Chi Minh, who is one of the most influent political leaders in Vietnam's history, always had a consistent belief that Vietnam would be an independent country throughout his lifetime and has achieved success too when he made a declaration of Independence of his country in September 1945. Moreover, a leader is shaped up by his principles and objectives. At any point in time, if he changes his beliefs, then it will mar his position in society and create chaos because people will not be able to discern his real character. Thus, a political leader creates an idiosyncrasy for himself and marches toward the path of success.
On the other hand, political leaders who have the advanced thought that never comprises the principles are considered to be credible and they can be trusted to eradicate the miseries of the people. The political leaders have to have the skills to critical thinking and listening to the desires of the people, it would result in avoiding the biases and gain more trusts from society. For instance, these days we have known that there are many types of genders in society especially the LGBT community which is the most community concerned, although there is still many countries or many political leaders having various opinions and disagree to adopt those who are in this community could be married, the USA in one of the first countries allow to adopt same-sex marriage which is a milestone in political history which obtained so much the agreement from society. In addition, in exigent cases where no other alternatives exist, we may have to change the principles so as to suit the needs of the current population. It is true to a certain extent that there is absolutely futility of keeping a principle which no longer does hold valid. As times are changing, the principles need to be changed. An effective leader is one who considers multiple points of view regarding a policy change, analyses their pros and cons, and finally arrives at a decision on whether to really manipulate the existing laws.
In conclusion, an effective leader in any society is identified by his commitment toward principles and objectives; it creates a clear picture of leader and engenders trust on him in the minds of the people. He who stubbornly adheres to his belief is sure to create impressions in the annals of the nation's history. Though the leaders can afford to change the principles sometimes, it must never go against his established motives that define his character. Therefore, great political leaders are always those who have flexibility in thinking but also have an established set of opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmunity could be married, the USA in one of the first countries allow to adopt sa...
^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adopting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: adopting
...SA in one of the first countries allow to adopt same-sex marriage which is a milestone ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 967, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...t, we may have to change the principles so as to suit the needs of the current populatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...create impressions in the annals of the nations history. Though the leaders can afford ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3010.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 608.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95065789474 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70716289788 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476973684211 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 972.0 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.4108861864 60.3974514979 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9523809524 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.04761904762 5.21951772744 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360820299091 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10968032111 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858703270481 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240978246468 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12471022933 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.