The claim of author that the major cities should get more grant from support of government because the writer considers that these nations's cultural traditions locaed in big cities could be preserved and generated. Nevertheless, from my point of view, I argue that small villages may maintain more traditional factors. The support to culture protection should be combined in major cities and small villages. Futhermore , the spirits and other invisible aspects in cultural are also crucial to preserve.
On the one hand, I think that there are some plausible reasons that some people think the government should expense money for big cities in order to thrive the traditional culture. First, It is unquestionable that major cities of a country are one of the most attract destinations for tourist and visitors so it leads to that if we want to improve and convey the image of inherited property, we need to boost the finance for the big cities. Besides that in these major cities, there are many facilities, technology and even many chances to expose with the foreign people, which facilitates the sharing and preservation of culture.
On the other hand, I believe that I would be more effective if the authorization prioritize the financial support for both big cities and small villages because of some obvious reasons. First of all, that more cultural factors may be remained in villages than in cities. For instance, in Peru, in a remote village it still exists a traditional language just by using the sound of whistle, It is very unique and the scientists claim that only about 200 people could know this kind of language so It is really needed to conserve and generate. Second, the cities are more vulnerable in battles than villages. The complex politic turmoil, often happened in huge cities, also has negative influences on the culture protection. In small villages, the calm and steady life style are better for culture proteciton. Some old architectures remain only damaged structure due to war. For example, the temple in Athens and the old summer palace in Beijing. Futhermore, in term of economic considerations, it would be more economical to protection the heritage in village than in cities. Because the cost to culture maintenance will be considerable lower than in the metropolis. In additions, the rare places in major cities may be used for better benefits such as hospitals, shools and so on
Moreover, more traditional factors such as poetry, literature and ballad are inherited invisible, regardless of the different areas. These intangible factors are maintained in small villages easier than in cities, since the life style in huge cities are influenced by modern technology productions and other foreign culture. The protection for these things doesnot need much financial support, but education and propagation.
In conclusion, both cities and villages have some kind of unique factor on cultural tradition. Small cities may contain more old culture factors in some aspects and are easier to preserve. Furthermore, invisible things need more attention and should be educated to next generations. If the financial and other methods supports are applied to cultural protection in both cities and villages, the excellent tradition will be inherited for long.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...or cities and small villages. Futhermore , the spirits and other invisible aspects...
^^
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o crucial to preserve. On the one hand, I think that there are some plausible re...
^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are one of the most attract destinations for tourist and visitors so it leads to ...
^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r instance, in Peru, in a remote village it still exists a traditional language j...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...st by using the sound of whistle, It is very unique and the scientists claim that only abou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1075, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the heritage in village than in cities. Because the cost to culture maintenance will be...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits such as hospitals, shools and so on Moreover, more traditional factors such ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, then, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2758.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20377358491 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7956125723 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456603773585 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.0 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.686678792 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.21951772744 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251438223922 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770815984021 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703762137466 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164869985321 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599348834914 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.