Revolutionary ideas commonly arise often from the place that no one’s are not looking for. The prompt suggests that the ideas are pure byproducts of passion. While I mostly agree with the statement, I do concede that that simply might not be the case in every situation.
Firstly, passion gives a sense of direction for the formulation of ideas. This means that if we aren’t looking in the correct direction there might be the case that we do not come across a particular example. For instance, if we are passionate about computers and coding, we are more likely to build an algorithm that can solve a particular idea, this is plausible only with existence of passion only. The reason being that lacking passion will never instigate a curiosity to solve newer problems or research about them. A simple example can be of renowned mathematician S. Ramanujan, who was completely passionate about the sheer aspects of mathematics. Passion brings new ideas as asserted by this example because Ramanujan used to observe mathematical patterns even in hallowed places such as temples. This passion instigated for him to prove many theorems and ideas that have worldwide applications. This shows how passion regarding a subject aligns and trains your thinking patterns leading to building of an idea.
Secondly, passion helps see the existing things more intuitively. Having an inclination towards a broader subject helps you identify the existing problems more clearly. For instance, take the case of the recent upheaval in the popularity of cryptocurrency, it is clear how not a lot of people are aware about the disadvantages of them. The disadvantages vary from its cybersecurity and vulnerabilities with minimal exploitability can lead to loss in millions. But someone who is actively passionate with the technology is aware the problems more clearly, depicting of inferring the write path towards solving the problem. Hence it is clear that how much it is important to identify a problem than just merely solving it, this identification without passion will lack insights and leave flaws in the gaping idea.
Although, there might be a case where the idea is just fortuitous, meaning it is accidental. This means that many discover an idea incidentally. For instance, many capitalists and investors invest in an idea which has a mere potential of capturing the market. While identification of problem is important, the idea might be from an area of expertise that one might not expect. Consider the case of Steve Jobs, who upon learning calligraphy was inspired to create more interactive fonts for the first Macintosh. This clearly shows, that passion does not merely bring an idea, some times being at the place and the ability to bring out an intuitive solution also brings a significantly better idea than existing solutions.
In conclusion, we see that there is no clear depiction of the correlation of passion and ideas, the existence of passion does create a sense of the direction and helps brainstorming with concrete mindset.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'arise'.
Suggestion: often arise
Revolutionary ideas commonly arise often from the place that no one’s are not lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... agree with the statement, I do concede that that simply might not be the case in every s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ms more clearly, depicting of inferring the write path towards solving the problem. Hence...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...write path towards solving the problem. Hence it is clear that how much it is importa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, incidentally, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2556.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16363636364 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92083488071 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.452146264 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.24 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179836187662 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521502471626 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274439098248 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101393326033 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308419988953 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.