People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

Decison making is highly objective than it is assumed to be. While each and every person has a different way of making a decision, a set of method should be in place to avoid any future regrets. The prompt suggest that the decision making shall not be handled with emotion. I mostly agree with the recommendation. There are three main reasons to support the stand.

Firstly, the emotions can make decisions 'rushed'. This prevents the person from making any form of analyses which might have been essential for the person. For instance, if a person is choosing a university for graduation, one must choose university based on analyses of several factors such as academics, faculty, insfrastructure, collabarations, placements etc. Decision based on emotions regarding any single factor might not result in the best university possible. This example shows how the person shall approach such decisions and analyse all factors rather than acting on emotions or any biases regarding the Universities. Thus making rushed decision might not be useful in such cases.

Secondly, emotions can change overtime which might lead to regret in the future. For instance, in 1994 when Steve Jobs was fired from the position of CEO by Apple just because he did not catch the public eye. Here apple acted on the emotions of people and themselves towards Steve Jobs, which led to the downfall of the company for the time being. This clearly shows that acting on emotions might lead to decision that has no vision for long term. Soon there had been change in Apple's emotion when they rehired Steve Jobs. This overturning of decision might not be the case in evey decision.

Although there have been cases where thinking too much about any particular decision has been a hazhard rather than taking the decision emotionally. One particular case that one might observe is simple as in a restraunt. For instance, in this particular case there is no need for much analyses in decision making rather an intuition or emotion towards a dish is enough. This shows that not ever decisions shall not be taken with emotion. Some decisions are just not worth the analyses.

In all, we can see that taking decisions is different according to the situation. Often we see that there is need for involvement of some sort of analyses of various factors, we also observe that acting on emotion once in a while is also better. While there is not perfect answer for the prompt's recommendation, doing some sort of analyses is always helpful to organise the thoughts. The degree of this organisation is dependent on person and situation.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e main reasons to support the stand. Firstly, the emotions can make decisions...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n might not be useful in such cases. Secondly, emotions can change overtime w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atch the public eye. Here apple acted on the emotions of people and themselves to...
^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shows that acting on emotions might lead to decision that has no vision for long ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht not be the case in evey decision. Although there have been cases where thi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ht not be the case in evey decision. Although there have been cases where thinking to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...is particular case there is no need for much analyses in decision making rather an i...
^^^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
...ile there is not perfect answer for the prompts recommendation, doing some sort of anal...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, sort of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96567505721 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62556870124 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480549199085 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3864054459 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4615384615 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8076923077 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24315932968 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818549899448 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631265432149 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14309733666 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488661208135 0.0667264976115 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.