The memo from vice president of a food distribution company suggests reuturning to Buzzoff Pest control service. This is based on the evidence that more worth of damage has been done, when pest control is conducted by Fly-away pest control company. However, while the conclusion drawn by the vice president might hold water, it rests on assumptions that, if not substantiated, dramatically weakens the persuasiveness of the arguments. Thus the three arguments must be answered.
First of all, it states that $20,000 food has been destroyed due to pests, while it might be true that the pest control of Fly Away company might be ineffective, there are several other causes that might have caused this to happen. For instance, the warehouse was exposed excessive humidity, that made the pest attack unavoidable. Further, consider the case that the quality of the food of a batch was deteriorated while it was in manufacturing and this batch delivered to Palm city . This might have led to pest infestation and pest control by different company would have made no difference . If either of the scenarios have merit, than the conclusion drawn by the argument is significantly weakened.
Secondly, it might be possible that the warehouses in Palm City and Wintervale have different environmental conditions. This means, a direct correlation cannot be formed. This places, due to several factors, might be different. For instance, there might be the case that pest infestation due to environment, is significantly higher in Palm city in comparision with Wintervale. Take another instance, that the shelf life of food, due to climatic conditions in Palm city, significantly decreases. This shows that the end result is indifferent to the company they select. If the above scenarios are true than author's argument does not hold water.
Lastly, it needs to be addressed that are the quantities or food in both warehouses are comparable or not. This means, that it plausible that the Palm city simply has a warehouse that can hold more than double capacity of food. This if true will explain that why the pest damage was of double worth. Further, it might be possible that the Palm city warehouse holds more expensive food items than the Wintervale warehouse does. This would make it easier to explain, the significant difference in total damage(in terms of money). If this is the case, then the author's argument does not hold weight.
In conclusion, the argument as it stands now, is consideraby flawed due to several unwarranted assumptions. If the vice president is able to address these assumptions and provide more evidence (perhaps in form of research study), then it will be possible to fully evaluate the validity of the suggestion to predilect Buzzoff pest Control Company over Fly-Away pest control company.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ns the persuasiveness of the arguments. Thus the three arguments must be answered. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d excessive humidity, that made the pest attack unavoidable. Further, consider th...
^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng and this batch delivered to Palm city . This might have led to pest infestation...
^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nt company would have made no difference . If either of the scenarios have merit, ...
^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... If either of the scenarios have merit, than the conclusion drawn by the argument is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...indifferent to the company they select. If the above scenarios are true than autho...
^^
Line 7, column 557, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...of money. If this is the case, then the authors argument does not hold weight. In co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 458.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14410480349 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85006549853 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449781659389 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 4.96107784431 323% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.70958083832 332% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7230710621 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298174033872 0.218282227539 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850704268471 0.0743258471296 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940238372699 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193875568266 0.128457276422 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728557414913 0.0628817314937 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ns the persuasiveness of the arguments. Thus the three arguments must be answered. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d excessive humidity, that made the pest attack unavoidable. Further, consider th...
^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng and this batch delivered to Palm city . This might have led to pest infestation...
^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nt company would have made no difference . If either of the scenarios have merit, ...
^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... If either of the scenarios have merit, than the conclusion drawn by the argument is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...indifferent to the company they select. If the above scenarios are true than autho...
^^
Line 7, column 557, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...of money. If this is the case, then the authors argument does not hold weight. In co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 458.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14410480349 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85006549853 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449781659389 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 4.96107784431 323% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.70958083832 332% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7230710621 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298174033872 0.218282227539 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850704268471 0.0743258471296 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940238372699 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193875568266 0.128457276422 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728557414913 0.0628817314937 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.