The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
The best ideas, which might give birth to innovations, definitely require a person to have a passionate interest in a particular topic. The respective topic may or may not be a commonplace thing. The given statement is not completely agreeable as there are many aspects related to how the best ideas come into existence. Person needs to be passionately interested in a thing in order to get inspired by, but that thing is not necessarily be a commonplace thing.
The given statement can be analyzed with the help of few examples. Issac Newton's invention of gravitational force, to be the first example, can be considered as a result of common place thing. It is said that he used to sit in a backyard, for his studies. One day, he observed an apple falling from a tree and thought about it, why it would have fell downwards?, why with specific speed?and many other things which led him to the finding of Earth's gravitational field. This example can be considered as a best idea coming from a commonplace thing.
Furthermore, the creation of Facebook like websites comes from a very passionate interest in innovating different ways to connect people. Connecting people easily to talk with each other, can be considered a very commonplace thing, but we have the results, something really great like Facebook, which today connects people all over the world without any boundaries, is the best output anyone can get out of it.
However, best ideas not necessarily come out of interest in very common things, there might be people who are getting involved in very extraordinary things, and while they keep going ahead in their most interested topic research, they may find something which is very useful for common people needs. For example, the invention of microwave. Scientists were experimenting on a Megatron tube when they realized that the heat generated form the microwaves can be safely used to cook food. And there we had, an invention of microwave ovens.
To conclude, it is not always necessary that if a person is interested in something passionately, it needs to be a commonplace thing. There are different aspects which needs to be analyzed before coming to any concrete conclusion about the given claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The best ideas, which might give birth t...
^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rticular topic. The respective topic may or may not be a commonplace thing. The g...
^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...may or may not be a commonplace thing. The given statement is not completely agree...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot necessarily be a commonplace thing. The given statement can be analyzed with...
^^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ield. This example can be considered as a best idea coming from a commonplace thi...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... idea coming from a commonplace thing. Furthermore, the creation of Facebook l...
^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om a commonplace thing. Furthermore, the creation of Facebook like websites c...
^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'websites'' or 'website's'?
Suggestion: websites'; website's
...hermore, the creation of Facebook like websites comes from a very passionate interest i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is the best output anyone can get out of it. However, best ideas not necessa...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est output anyone can get out of it. However, best ideas not necessarily come...
^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
... anyone can get out of it. However, best ideas not necessarily come out of inter...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... had, an invention of microwave ovens. To conclude, it is not always necessary ...
^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crete conclusion about the given claim.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9490616622 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85439578052 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514745308311 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5981674197 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.588235294 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13892579698 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504383873858 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331379647209 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085448161224 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172712591326 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.