The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Through the journey of life all of us are bound to face failure. We must not sulk and tumble into a pit of depression when we encounter failure. Instead we must analyze our shortcomings and improve accordingly. Sometimes it helps if the people around us give us feedback to improve. Therefore, the best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
This process of encouraging feedback is highly effective especially in companies. Being open-minded enough to receive feedback reflects the core values of the leader. Consider, the CEO of a company who takes timely feedback from the employees and gets back to them with his views regarding the feedback. This shows that even the CEO is above reproach and has areas he needs to improve in. This feedback can provide the CEO with insight that contributes to the success of the company. Therefore, leaders who encourage feedback can use at as an asset to succeed.
The employees or the group of people led by such a leader tend to respect them more because they their leader as someone who is human and is allowed to commit errors. Sometimes, when we fail we spend all our time wracking our brains, trying to pin point where we went wrong. Then suddenly our parents come by and in a jiffy tell us exactly why we failed. So, a fresh pair of eyes on the problem can prove to be extremely beneficial.
Having said that, the way the feedback is structured also matters. Most leaders don't care for feedback because it is formulated in a manner that is either too negative and inflicts pain in the user or is simple too vague and therefore useless.
The structuring of the feedback affects the reader so the people must be mindful of they way they give feedback if they want to be heard.
An intrepid leader would definitely encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. It is a quality that people admire in their leaders. It shows that a person isn't full of himself and believes that there is always room for improvement. Therefore, being open to feedback can help a leader understand what the people want and act in accordance with the betterment of him people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...f depression when we encounter failure. Instead we must analyze our shortcomings and im...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s structured also matters. Most leaders dont care for feedback because it is formula...
^^^^
Line 10, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...n their leaders. It shows that a person isnt full of himself and believes that there...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, regarding, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73138297872 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53001308648 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539893617021 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0735781289 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8636363636 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21240164184 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681337732594 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865947670159 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113753866091 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048322383191 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.