The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Society is made of different types of people. Some might argue that by creating a sense of competition among young people, is the best way to prepare them for leadership role in different sectors like government, industries, or other fields. While other may feel that the best practise is to promote cooperation. I believe that a mixture of both cooperation and competition would help a person to be a great leader. My point of view would be explain in the following essay.
A person becomes a good leader when he is a good listner. To become a good listner one should be patient, and listen to all the ideas and suggestions which are presented in front of him. The leader should not differentiate among the people from which the idea or suggestion is coming. To achieve all this a person should be cooperative with his peers and team members. For instance, imagine there are two leaders, leader A and leader B. Leader A is cooperative and follows horizontal chain of command. He always listens to different ideas and suggestion which are presented in front of him irrespective of the person who is delivering. While leader B is not cooperative and follows vertical chain of command, and he rejects the ideas and suggestion which are presented in front of him. He insist that the work should be done by the method he has told and no other. In the end the team led by leader A would be better compare to team led by leader B, as in team of leader A was open to discussion so ideas got exchange and the most optimal and best idea was selected. While this was not a case in team B.
By following cooperation there are many advantages like, team bonding is better, communication is better, profits are more for the company. Cooperation is also beneficial for the different indutries as well as in goverement. If the leader of a political party is cooperative and listens to the complains which are presented in front of him by the residents of the society, then this helps to increase trust and believility of the leader among the people.
However, a competition is also needed for growth and success of an individual. Competition helps to motivate people to achieve higher goals and work more then usual to deafeat his or her competitor. For instance, if there is a healty competition among two friends that who would score more in an exam. So, this competition would motivate both the persons to stay on track and not get diverted. They would study with much greater determination to deafet the other person and in the end both friends marks would increase.
In conclusion, a mixture of cooperation and having a healty competiton would be the best way to teach young people to become a leader in different sectors. This approach would help an individual to be a better individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...overnment, industries, or other fields. While other may feel that the best practise i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 789, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'insists'.
Suggestion: insists
...which are presented in front of him. He insist that the work should be done by the met...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e to achieve higher goals and work more then usual to deafeat his or her competitor....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69120654397 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75936798634 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415132924335 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7375685864 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2307692308 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8076923077 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57692307692 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200167845924 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606674321305 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713175242183 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138872698887 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787327999321 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.