Younger generation is certainly the future of the society and therefore it is essential that they are well prepared to take leadership roles if future. It becomes important that they are prepared from every perspective possible. But to decide what factor is essential to be incorporated to prepare young people to become a successful leader is debatable. I partially agree with the statement that we should instill a sense of cooperation in them but not instilling a sense of competition would not result in successful leaders.
The school or college going students often being supported by parents, teachers or their peers are not quite subjected to the real world scenarios where in a real leadership role they less likely to enjoy the support from them that they do now. So to provide them an experience of the real world scenario they should be subjected to a competitive environment. They should be encouraged to participate in various competitions that prepares them to take similar roles in future. The school or home environment can be very different or opposite to the real world, where being able to handle competition is an essential quality.
A leadership role in the work environment is difficult to perform with lack of cooperation. To perform a task they would require help from their employees and peers. So it is essential that they learn how to work or cooperate well with not only their peers but also in subordinates and employees. For example, a political leader cannot win an election without sufficient support from their party activists or proponents. If the political leader doesn't cooperate well with his party members he might be affecting his likelihood of winning the elections. So in a leadership role it becomes essential that they to cooperate with others to gain success.
At times, it is possible that a leader will be subjected to competition form their opponents. They need to be prepared to handle such situations tactfully. A leader who is not prepared to handle competition might succumb under the pressure and fail. For example, in government, an elected political leader is often scrutinized and criticized by their opponents for new policies or changes that they wish to implement. If a newly implemented policy is not fairly received by the citizens then the opponents will find ways to blame the political leader for being incapable. In such situation the leader needs to be prepared to deal with this competition.
In conclusion, a leader in any field would be able to perform well if they are instilled with not just a sense of cooperation but also competition from an early age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents often being supported by parents, teachers or their peers are not quite su...
^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hat prepares them to take similar roles in future. The school or home environment can be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...om their party activists or proponents. If the political leader doesnt cooperate w...
^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... or proponents. If the political leader doesnt cooperate well with his party members h...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...leader will be subjected to competition form their opponents. They need to be prepar...
^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not just a sense of cooperation but also competition from an early age.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2200.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02283105023 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88988071052 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452054794521 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2650099463 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.761904762 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11154091587 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410799337675 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324802730484 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729835303168 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399654359808 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.