The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Human beings differentiated themselves from other primates through a long, systematic process of neurological adaptations to life in communities. In order to evolve from comparatively small groups spread across vast areas to extensive cities, it was imprescindible to rely less on competitive patterns of behavior to more altruistic approaches to resolve quotidian challenges of collective life.
In this significative change in the way we position ourselves towards others, education assumed a primal role in conducing infants and adolescents to the expected roles they would inequivocaly play for effective social functioning. It is in the microsystem of the educational institutions that young people acquire the tools and knowledge they will display when faced with the unavoidable hardships that humans endure in order to satay alive.
If one can, when presented with historical data, acknowledge that in different contexts of societal development throughout its documented trajectory conflict was a relevant element in personal and collective disputes, it is also important to notice that we presently live in a world that is no longer compatible with strategies other than cooperation in order to thrive as a civilization.
An irrefutable example lies in the development of technologies, not previously available, that carry the potential to decimate life, like nuclear artifacts and biological weapons of mass destruction. Only through pacific, mutually beneficial agreements may humankind conceive a prosper future for the generations to come.
New developments in behavioral neuroscience have progressively demonstrated that contemporary men are wired for social connection, with an increasing number of experiments in transversal areas such as social psychology and game theory advocating for the endowement of the young with the social apparatus that will allow positive connections with their peers, making quotidian decisions regarding themselves and those around them a path to a new chapter in our evolution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cross vast areas to extensive cities, it was imprescindible to rely less on compe...
^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., acknowledge that in different contexts of societal development throughout its d...
^^
Line 13, column 277, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...icial agreements may humankind conceive a prosper future for the generations to come. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, regarding, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86241610738 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3341944821 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.671140939597 0.4932671777 136% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.759157902 60.3974514979 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 218.375 118.986275619 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.25 23.4991977007 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113840901539 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417233856237 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298336179664 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05293729231 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286582511861 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.8 14.1392134831 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 8.54 48.8420337079 17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.92365168539 201% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.3 12.1743820225 175% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.3 12.1639044944 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.78 8.38706741573 140% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.