"The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."
In this competitive world, young people's leadership is a must for government, industry, or other fields. Now it is society's responsibility to make them competent for the post. Society can grow cooperation or competition among young people. Now the prompt supports that installing cooperation is the best way to make young people a good leader. I agree with the above prompt and argue that cooperation can build a good young leader for the following reasons.
First of all, young people can learn a lot from their fellow colleagues. No one does not know everything from the beginning. Everyone has some drawbacks. One can share his gathered good tips about leadership to his fellow colleague about the issues that he needs to improve to become a good leader. For example, in an event, one young employee got huge applause for his contribution to make the event well-coordinated. On the other hand, one of his friends in another company got criticized due to his bad leadership activity in an event. Now, this friend can take tips from his above friend about how to become a good leader. Also within a company, if we grow cooperation among young leaders, everyone can learn from their mistakes.
Secondly, competition among young leaders without a sense of cooperation will create a bad environment in the job field. As a result, no one can improve his or her capability of being a good leader. It will also create a toxic working environment among young officers. They will become frustrated. That's why we can see that those who become good leaders are also cooperative.
Finally, cooperation also inspires young people to become good leaders. If they see that no one helps others, they will become frustrated and will not want to be a good leader.
Of course, there is a need for competition among leaders to improve quality among them. However, without cooperation, it will not be successful in the long run and the company will also fail. So, it is better for society to promote cooperation as well as competition among young leaders to make successful company leaders for society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'colleagues'.
Suggestion: colleagues
...young people can learn a lot from their fellow colleagues. No one does not know everything from t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'colleague'.
Suggestion: colleague
...hered good tips about leadership to his fellow colleague about the issues that he needs to impro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...iend about how to become a good leader. Also within a company, if we grow cooperatio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... officers. They will become frustrated. Thats why we can see that those who become go...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, of course, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93767705382 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77989001986 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464589235127 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5952910372 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7826086957 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.347826087 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259982036692 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894693429821 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887191910569 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16596741111 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118931207756 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.