The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in
government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of
cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree
or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position,
be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that
could be used to challenge your position.
Eventhough, some people believe that perfect way of preparing young people for leadership in various firms is to create an urge for co-operation instead of competion, I believe that competation plays equally significant role. While co-operation creates harmoney, one cannot deny the fact that competation is necessary for personal growth. Leader is one who
First, I would like to consoider Leader as the one who motivates, inspires, guides, and helps people to achieve success. He should be able to maintain co-operation among his team members. While its true that co-operation is essential for friendly and healthy environment inside an office, it is not possible to achieve bigger goals without healthy competation because there will not be any motivation for employees to work hard. To illustrate this fact, I would like to take IT filed as an example. Major IT giants like Google, Microsoft, Facebook are ruling the IT world because they are too good in their products and they are extremely competative. Their leaders are extremely competative and they hire employees with similar mindset.
In addition to this, competation in government is equally important. If there is a strong competation between two political leaders then it is more likely that they do some good things to public to win at the next upcoming elections.
Finally, co-operation is essential for maintaining peace in the society. It is necessary for development of a product but it is the quality needed for team members or citizens of the society. While, leaders should be competative, he should not make compromises with his team members. If leafder is not competative enough then there could be other set of people producing the same product with better features and qualities. Nokia company is best example for this. They did not lose their value bucause there was not enough o-operation between leaders, but because they failed to compete with Android phones. They stick to their legacy basic models.
In summary, I would like to say that leaders are the ones who lead the society or company. For success of their firm and for the well being of their community it is important that they should be competative enough for the well being of their people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y for personal growth. Leader is one who First, I would like to consoider Leader ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... Google, Microsoft, Facebook are ruling the IT world because they are too good in thei...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion in government is equally important. If there is a strong competation between t...
^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...r features and qualities. Nokia company is best example for this. They did not lose the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11444141689 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75134747178 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523160762943 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0056154273 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7894736842 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120207199479 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400812005649 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498876248405 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751771420505 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487792108262 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.