The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic stated is rather controversial. It is definitely essential to acknowledge positive actions as encouragement and positive feedback incite passion. However, focussing only on the positives and neglecting the negatives can prove detrimental. Anybody willing to learn should also be willing to accept criticism for their mistakes. Showering praise and bringing to light only the good things about a person might have the grievous consequence of making the person arrogant and over-confident to the extent where learning takes the back-seat and the person is more interested in proving himself than acquiring new knowledge.
Praising the positive aspects definitely has an obvious impact on the learners. For instance, a student will be greatly motivated to better his performance and score better grades if he receives praise and encouragement. People always need a mentor to give them positive feedback on how they are performing so that they have a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment. Without recognition for their achievements, people will gradually lose the interest and passion and learning will eventually come to a halt.
Learners, especially students are greatly affected by criticism. Criticism should refrain from being harsh as this might cause the learner to lose hope and interest. Even though negative criticism proves to be a great teacher, it is only so if done in moderation. Negative feedback and criticism, when considered in the right way would lead to betterment of the person. After all, failures are the stepping stones to success. For instance, Sachin Tendulkar, the legendary cricketer, was ridiculed by people when he fared poorly in matches. He however took the criticism in his stride and went on to create history.
Criticism would lead to the judgement of what is right and what is wrong and unacceptable. By being exposed to criticism, the learner is at a better position to learn what is not considered as a positive action and can thus abstain from undertaking such actions again. It is up to the learner to take the negative comments in a good way and not allow it to affect his learning but instead allow criticism to be a teacher.
It goes without saying that encouragement and praise go a long way in boosting up one’s morale and kindling interest in them to learn more and perform better. However, the fact that negative criticism creates in the person the urge to better oneself and prove one’s worth cannot be denied. In conclusion, it can be said that teaching should definitely comprise of praising the learner for the good aspects, but at the same time, it should also comprise of an appropriate amount of healthy criticism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 363, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...be said that teaching should definitely comprise of praising the learner for the good aspec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 455, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...s, but at the same time, it should also comprise of an appropriate amount of healthy critic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, after all, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18306636156 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91787946979 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50114416476 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.952797175 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.954545455 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124933094072 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384309384574 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374333793529 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770800610704 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279676127805 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.