The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Giving the carrot and whip treatment might be a good way of teaching. However, this claim overlooks the circumstances where approbation may not be pertinent and a sound reprehension may be beneficial.

Complementary remarks may lead to better behaviors. By receiving praises, people can increase their self-esteem, confidence, and abilities. Especially, praising young students for their good behavior might help strengthen these positive actions in the future. When parents see their children's positive actions and praises them immediately, then the children will learn which actions are deemed praiseworthy, enabling them to repeat those actions. On the other hand, if parents are to respond to only negative behaviors, their children will likely to exhibit only bad actions.

In addition, in many cases, minor peccadilloes can be overlooked. Mistakes and error are a natural process of learning and if parents interfere with every single action, it might deteriorate the children's curiosity and imagination of the world. Similarly, teachers should avoid admonishing or punishing students for lack of logic and incorrect answers to questions. Otherwise students will get afraid of going wrong and will stop trying.

Nonetheless, the absolute depletion of construction criticism may not be beneficial in guiding young students. Parents should not turn a blind eye to their children's behavior when it compromises with other's safety. Teachers should let actions that disturb the learning process go past; furthermore, they should correct students on their exams and homework to inform and guide the students to grasp the subject and prevent them from making the same mistakes.

In conclusion, both accolade and constructive criticism is important for a children's development. Nevertheless, these actions should be suitably managed so as to not harm the children.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...gic and incorrect answers to questions. Otherwise students will get afraid of going wrong...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hese actions should be suitably managed so as to not harm the children.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, similarly, so, then, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in many cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67971530249 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98913742852 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9513470193 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0868957649177 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272513097504 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363017152409 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437346074897 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357230081 0.0667264976115 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.