The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
The author's concern regarding the disposal of consumer generated waste is quite understandable. Which is the reason why he has proposed a stern policy for garbage control. However, instead of imposing harsh rules, options like "Reduce,Reuse,Recycle" should be advocated. People should be educated regarding the benefits of recycling the waste, rather than implementing laws that might not serve the intended purpose.
Let us first discuss the negative effects which the author's suggestion can give rise to. Garbage is generated in all most every activity that a person does in his daily life. Inhibiting that quantity seems unrealistic. Even if a strict policy is brought into place for restriction on waste generation, it is highly possible that illegal ways would be found out as an alternative to dispose the garbage. Instead of solving one problem, several other issues might pop up.
Efficient way to control garbage disposal is to recycle the waste items. This is a very environment friendly approach. Recycling the materials will result in conservation of natural resources, which in turn will be very advantageous for the health of our environment. Daily items like papers and steel cans should be reused once they have been recycled. A lot many trees can be saved and mineral resources can be protected from getting emptied.
Recycling is directly related to a nation's economy. Economy drastically comes down when the natural resources are used in an extravagant way. Reusing the the waste materials will not only save the resources but also generate jobs in abundance.
After the waste is collected, it has to be sorted out. The sorted material has to undergo several processes before it can be reused. This whole cycle has the potential to provide bread and butter to many people.
Hence, looking at the benefits of recycling the garbage, it has definitely got an upper hand over implementing a stern policy to control waste disposal. However, such laws can be useful in limiting the use of plastic that causes irreparable harm to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Reuse
...g harsh rules, options like 'Reduce,Reuse,Recycle' should be advocated. Peop...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an extravagant way" with adverb for "extravagant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...own when the natural resources are used in an extravagant way. Reusing the the waste materials will n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...are used in an extravagant way. Reusing the the waste materials will not only save the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...are used in an extravagant way. Reusing the the waste materials will not only save the ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237113402062 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.201030927835 0.157235817809 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0824742268041 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0515463917526 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0231958762887 0.0444667217837 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0850515463918 0.12292977631 69% => OK
Participles: 0.0876288659794 0.0406280797675 216% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.18387800255 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0283505154639 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0103092783505 0.0016655270985 619% => OK
Determiners: 0.0953608247423 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0360824742268 0.0249443105267 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0180412371134 0.0148568991511 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2094.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 334.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.26946107784 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392215568862 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311377245509 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.218562874251 0.200843997647 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137724550898 0.132149295362 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18387800255 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607784431138 0.48968727796 124% => OK
Word variations: 70.6845717817 55.4138127331 128% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.1818181818 23.380412469 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5253372507 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 141.124799967 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 23.380412469 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.454545454545 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 46.3195427327 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.48598130841 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384614995954 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0788019197752 0.123202303941 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0764464232363 0.077325440228 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494358369725 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162578455766 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131110912696 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810026317401 0.0892212321368 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.251132940763 0.385218514788 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0486574508634 0.0692045440612 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235640147513 0.275328986314 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00920712073631 0.0653680567796 14% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.