Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.Write a

Essay topics:

Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.

Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based

Politicians are regarded as the representatives of common people; while government experts are the subject matter specialists in their respective fields. To put simply, there is no denying that the politicians and other government officers are much more informed than the general public. Hence, it would be absolutely sensible to affirm that major decisions regarding policy formation should be left to leaders and officials. However, public opinion is of utmost importance while framing some policies as they directly impact the common man. Though the power to take the final decision should always lie with government, people's genuine interests should not be snubbed.

Government primarily focuses on financial policies to make the country economically strong. Economists, financial experts, and leaders put their brains together to sketch out the best possible ways to give a boost to the economy. Financial policies are bit complex and not so easy for other people to comprehend. Foreign trade laws and GDP related issues can not be understood by everyone. But, while deciding tax slabs, provident fund and gratuity related norms, views of general public should definitely be taken into account. If majority of the people are opposed to paying tax on their provident fund amount, then such offensive policies should not be encouraged.

It is highly possible that officials might misuse their power for personal gains. For example, companies are often provided a wilderness to set up their production factories. Doing so, can snatch away the livelihood of those living nearby the factory area. Also, it may cause damage to endangered species. In that case, it is inevitable for general public to come into picture before any policy is framed. Surely companies should not benefit at the cost of common people.

To recapitulate, right to make policy decisions should be with the politicians and the government experts. But, to ensure that those policies don't act against the well being of people, it is important to involve members of general public while forming important policies.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...fficers are much more informed than the general public. Hence, it would be absolutely sensible...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
... to the economy. Financial policies are bit complex and not so easy for other peopl...
^^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nd and gratuity related norms, views of general public should definitely be taken into account...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ies. In that case, it is inevitable for general public to come into picture before any policy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
..., it is important to involve members of general public while forming important policies.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36253776435 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68078162459 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595166163142 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3298443635 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4210526316 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333246530237 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912340125108 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906614718439 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201072544797 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109762476348 0.0667264976115 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.